User talk:Alex 21/Archive 42

C. E. Webber
I noticed that not long ago you edited this page. I want to draw your attention to the use of Shannon Patrick Sullivan's website being used as a source, which I think you have removed from other Doctor Who related articles as not being reliable. Is that correct? Rodericksilly (talk) 03:55, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * As you have not responded, I'm going ahead and removing the source myself. Thanks. Rodericksilly (talk) 19:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Go for it, I have no qualms about it. (Sorry about the late response.) -- / Alex /21  00:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Clarification for series overviews
Hi, I was hoping you could clear up for me whether or not to use a subheading for a series overview when adding it on a main page. It was my understanding that you just placed it between the Episodes, and Season 1 heading without one. The only info I could find was MOS:TVOVERVIEW. I interpret that as no subheading is required when the overview is on a main page, and a separate section heading is used when on a list of episodes page. But I've been reverted when removing subheadings, and had them added when I don't use them. So I'm just confused, as some pages have one and others don't. A lot of pages marked as good seem to NOT have them. Is this one of those things where it's up to the editor? Or is there a right way? Racheal Emilin (talk) 00:38, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , you are correct. As I stated in my revert, a series overview table is an overview of the entire Episodes section (hence series "overview"), meaning it should be at the top of the Episodes section without subsectioning it off. Episode tables are sectioned off, because Season 1 is separate from Season 2, but the table summarizes all the seasons. On a LoE page, being an "episodes" page, it summarizes the entire article, hence it having its own section, and being the very first section at that. -- / Alex /21  01:08, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I seen both with and without Series overview label as a subsection on the main articles including good television articles. I believe it is up to editors. Nothing on MOS:TVOVERVIEW explicitly said a subsection label for the Series overview is frown upon the main article without a List of episodes article nor any past discussions that said that. WP:OSE. — Young Forever (talk)   01:42, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * OSE is completely irrelevant here, so I'm not sure why it was quoted basically as an add-on explain-all? This essay is not a standard reply that can be hurled against anyone you disagree with who has made a reference to how something is done somewhere else.
 * None of this changes the fact that a series overview summaries the entire episodes section and hence belongs at the extreme top of the section. For example, see how Arrowverse doesn't have an opening subsection, because it all concerns the development, and there's only a new subsection when the development concerns a specific topic. In the same vein, we shouldn't use an opening subsection for a series overview, because it concerns all of the seasons/episodes, and there's only new subsections (i.e. season headers) when the episodes section concerns a specific season. -- / Alex /21  06:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Yet, there are still good television articles have both with and without Series overview label as a subsection on the main articles for those without List of episodes articles. So, OSE is relevant. — Young Forever (talk)   16:40, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , can you give the guideline or policy that clearly states that content should be acceptable if it's in an article that's passed a GA review? I also clearly cited OSE and how it doesn't apply; don't just state "oh and OSE" as if it's a catch-all. -- / Alex /21  21:30, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * On WP:GA, good article (GA) is an article that meets a core set of editorial standards, the good article criteria, passing through the good article nomination process successfully. They are well written, contain factually accurate and verifiable information, are broad in coverage, neutral in point of view, stable, and illustrated, where possible, by relevant images with suitable copyright licenses. — Young Forever (talk)   22:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , yes, I know what a GA is. You failed to answer my question completely. Where is the guideline or policy that explicitly states "if it's in a GA article then it's acceptable in other articles"? -- / Alex /21  22:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

House of the Dragon
Just out of curiosity, are there any negative issues with adding line breaks? If this is just a style issue, I really must urge you to go back to the previous version.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 01:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , is there any reason to include it? Why are they necessary at all? -- / Alex /21  02:06, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Nevermind, I see here that they can cause accessibility concerns.—TriiipleThreat (talk) 02:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Marvel Cinematic Universe Good Article Reassessment
Marvel Cinematic Universe, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 04:59, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

"Draft:Untitled Walking Dead spin-off" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Draft:Untitled Walking Dead spin-off. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 23 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 09:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

"Draft:Untitled The Walking Dead spin-off" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Draft:Untitled The Walking Dead spin-off. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 23 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Gonnym (talk) 09:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Extant Season 1 DVD.png
Thanks for uploading File:Extant Season 1 DVD.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Extant Season 2 DVD.png
Thanks for uploading File:Extant Season 2 DVD.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Color template for List of Trolls: The Beat Goes On! episodes
I just want to point out that those randomly used colors make no sense. Rainbow colors fit the theme of trolls better so not arbitrary change there. And for the record there was no edit war, just an attempt to introduce a better color scheme. Have you any suggestions to improve the choice of colors? Deltasim (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Beebo Saves Christmas
Where do we add info for this upcoming TV special? Or is it better to create a draft? Kailash29792 (talk)  11:52, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
 * , definitely a draft, but we could add a separate Specials section to List of Legends of Tomorrow episodes (as this is a different sort of special to "Crisis on Infinite Earths: Part Five"). -- / Alex /21  14:32, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Transclusion check
Hey Alex. I just made some edits to the Phase Four article to adjust what parts of the TV overview table are transcluded where at the TV list and the main MCU article. I was hoping you wouldn't mind looking over my edits to make sure I put the right "dontclose", brackets, and "end" templates, etc. because I can get confused by what needs to be done. I think I did it all correctly. As well, I noticed for the Guardians Holiday special, if I did "Series overview|Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Four" it then made the series name not appear, so I ultimately didn't include that. Is that wrong? Thanks! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:43, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey Favre. Made a few tweaks, but all looks perfectly fine! (And honestly, it looks so much tidier now in the released/upcoming format than before).
 * Really strange about the specials entry; I'll take a look into that. All the "Series overview|Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Four" code it used for is for the transclusion parameters. Take Marvel's ABC television series, for example, and how its overview uses onlyinclude - that means it shows the network on the transcluded-to page, but not the original page (mimicking the behaviour of the onlyinclude tag). So, "Series overview|Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase Four" will only be needed for the special once it's released to toggle the Status column (not until 2022!), but it's still something for me to look into. -- / Alex /21  00:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks! I restored the transclusion tags around infoC for WandaVision because while all the changes looked correct, "Released" wasn't appearing. Any thoughts? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:52, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Ohh, it looks like I accidentally got rid of y in the first overview when implementing the "transclude" parameter, my bad. All fixed! -- / Alex /21  13:06, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The Guardians Holiday special issue is also fixed! -- / Alex /21  13:15, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! - Favre1fan93 (talk) 15:30, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

"Untitled Game of Thrones prequel" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Untitled Game of Thrones prequel. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:35, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Sorry about the revert
Hey, I'm sorry about reverting the edit. I will try my best to not let it happen again. —Bu <span style="color:orange;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#F83A0C,#FF6347);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">kk <span style="color:orange;background:-webkit-linear-gradient(0deg,#FFD228,#FED057);-webkit-background-clip:text;-webkit-text-fill-color:transparent">it 20:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , all good! I was genuinely confused by it, given that it was removing unsourced material. I do see now that it was a semi-automated edit. -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  21:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you
Just wanted to say thank you chiming in at the Q Force RM. It can be quite exhausting to have to deal with a "wrongheaded" editor (stubborn mule, even?) all by yourself :) Lennart97 (talk) 12:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Could you ...
... kindly point me to the official wiki rule for this please? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Grishaverse&diff=1029119640&oldid=1027545775 (I think it's rather idiotic, but if it's official then that's that). 165.1.194.41 (talk) 15:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes. WP:NAVBOX. -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  23:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks. 165.1.194.41 (talk) 08:30, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Just so you know
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. <b style="color:LightCoral">HighInBC</b> Need help? Just ask. 08:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Uw-accessdate2
Template:Uw-accessdate2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Schierbecker (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Tips on editing
Hey there Alex i'm new to editing in the wikipedia world, got any tips i should have to avoid bad editing i guess? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rogue1601 (talk • contribs)
 * I've posted a welcome notice to your talk page at User talk:Rogue1601, which will include some helpful tips and links for you! Happy editing! -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  06:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Plot summaries
Thank you for your message. I couldn't figure out how to leave a message for you on my own talk page, so here I am. I thought the plot summaries should be as comprehensive as possible, since presumably most people who come to read them, come for spoilers; that is indeed why I came to the page, and why I wanted to add to the summaries, as I felt they were missing a lot of plot points. However, I understand that Wikipedia has its own rules, and with a limit of 200 words, there is not much that can be added to the summaries. Still, shame. Thank you for the info.

--Amaybury (talk) 10:43, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Please move the page Draft:The Sound of Magic to The Sound of Magic
hi, you moved the article The Sound of Magic to draft space with a redirect of main article, on the grounds that it has not begun filming. Here are 2 links which indicate that the Ji Chang-wook, the main lead of the series is presently filming the series, 1. "He (Ji Chang-wook) is expected to join after 'Anna Sumanara', which is currently being filmed.", 2. Ji Chang-wook is currently filming Netflix's 'Anna Sumanara'. Another link also indicates that Hwang In-youp the second lead is filming the series, "He (Hwang In-youp) is currently in the midst of filming the role of Nile-deung in the Netflix original series 'Anna Sumanara'". Please move the page to main space. Thanks. Rickyurs (talk) 06:50, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Now that filming having commenced is now included and sourced, I've moved the article back. Cheers. -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  10:15, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Mort Dinner Rick Andre
Hi, I've expanded Draft:Mort Dinner Rick Andre and would normally move it to mainspace, or request G6 of the redirect so it can be moved, but here there's a non-trivial page history (including copying from Mort Dinner Rick Andre to the draft in an edit of yours). I think the correct method here is a round robin swap of the two pages—is that right? And if so, I notice you're a page mover, so would you be able to carry this out? Thanks! — Bilorv ( talk ) 20:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , ✅ -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  00:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Brilliant, thanks! — Bilorv ( talk ) 10:23, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Doctor Who (2022 specials)
I went ahead and started Draft:Doctor Who (2022 specials), just thought I'd let you know since you're generally the main contributor to Doctor Who articles. I think it's pretty solid already. The Doctor Who (talk) 21:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , brilliant! Thanks for that. -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  21:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

On second thought, after reading over them both, that article actually meets WP:NTV (as well as the Notability (television) that's currently being drafted). I know there's not a rush but, it has both a source that confirms episodes are filming as part of the thirteenth series, a confirmed start date of 1 January, and more than enough reliable sources. Since these conditions are met it could very well stand in the mainspace. The Doctor Who (talk) 02:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You're definitely correct that it would meet NTV, but I still think it's too early, given that they've only been announced for a day, and filming information can be included in the Series 13 article for now. I'd say publish it once Series 13 is close to finishing, then we move all filming information across (even if it was filmed as part of S13, same as the 2008 and 2013 specials filming tables). -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  14:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for so many recent posts here, this one isn't regarding the specials itself and should hopefully be the last one for the time being, anyways not sure if you wanna do something with this or not. I imagine someone at the BBC or on the production team had to contact Moffat if they intended to use the Weeping Angels since he originally created them for Blink. The actual Instagram post has since been edited after he realized it hadn't been previously announced, that's what the bit at the end in parenthesis is about, but since RT reported on it, it seems like solid information. The Doctor Who (talk) 08:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
 * , revisiting this, I think it might be a good idea to move it, so we can separate the specials from Series 13, especially given recent news, confirming the director for one episode and that the first two specials have actually concluded filming. -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  02:17, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Have you seen this?
Hello A21. I hope your summer - oops I mean winter - is going well. Getta load of this website. I'm not O/C enough to have done all this research on my own but I'm glad that others are. Make sure to check out their info about Blake's 7 as well. Here is another one that I just stumbled across. Cheers. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 18:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi again. This morning I found this gem. Must be nice to have the cash to indulge your hobby :-) MarnetteD&#124;Talk 16:30, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Please move the page Draft:Hellbound (TV series) to Hellbound (TV series)

 * hi, you moved the article Hellbound (TV series) to draft space with a redirect of main article. Now the series is going to be premiered at 46th Toronto International Film Festival, to be held from September 9 to 18, 2021. Here are the links for verification: 1. Hellbound in Primetime section of TIFF, 2."Netflix's 'Hell' is the first Korean drama to be invited to the Toronto International Film Festival", 3. Director Yeon Sang-ho's 'Hell' officially invited to the Toronto International Film Festival in the prime time category. Another twitter link from Netflix also informs that the series is invited to TIFF, "Netflix series 'Hell' has been officially invited to the Primetime section of the 46th Toronto International Film Festival". Please move the page to main space. Thanks. Rickyurs (talk) 04:40, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , ✅ -- / Alex /<sub style="color:#008">21  04:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Userscript for moving files
I noticed you move files manually and update the filenames in articles manually as well. As updating filenames is a drag I created LuckyRename some time ago, you may want to give it a try. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 12:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

your assistance
Hello! I'm a random person on Wikipedia. I'm asking you for assistance on a draft. I'm having trouble finding reliable sources, as well as confusion on what I should write. I was wondering if you could help. Draft here:Dark One.

Thanks! Heroisraelovishnuourlordoursavior (talk) 09:41, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Reply-link officially superseded by DiscussionTools
Hi! Reply-link has officially been superseded by DiscussionTools, which you can install using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under. DiscussionTools, developed by the WMF's Editing Team, is faster and has more features than reply-link, and it wouldn't make sense for me to keep developing reply-link. I think the Editing Team is doing amazing work, and look forward to what they can do in the future. Thank you for using reply-link over the years! Enterprisey (talk!) 06:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Brooklyn Nine-Nine episode redirects to lists


A tag has been placed on Category:Brooklyn Nine-Nine episode redirects to lists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 16:43, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doctor Who (series 12)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Doctor Who (series 12) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of User: -- User: (talk) 21:01, 27 October 2021 (UTC)