User talk:Alex G. SLC

Before you make any more edits, please take a look at Wikipedia guidlines regarding WP:PAID and consider adding a disclosure accordingly. - Anon1-3483579 (talk) 22:15, 25 October 2017 (UTC) See of of many article citing: http://newsregister.com/article?articleTitle=don-rsquo-t-let-museum-fall-to-pair-coveting-its-carcass--1507937452--27655--
 * I'm not sure how you could use that article to cite any of your edits. The content you added has nothing to do with that article. I also notice the one you've provided is an editorial on a purely local paper anyways. - Anon1-3483579 (talk) 23:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Still, I would suggest you look at WP:PAID, as if you are being paid to make edits (ie. employed by Steve Down) you must disclose this information or you are violating WP:PAID.-Anon1-3483579 (talk) 23:59, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

=Steve Down Edits=

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Recent edits are obviously in violation of WP:NOTADVERTISING. Placing links to unrelated fluff articles in edit summaries does not help your case here. "Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion"

-Anon1-3483579 (talk) 20:45, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please don't try to trick Wikipedia contributors by using a false edit summary.

- Anon1-3483579 (talk) 22:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)


 * My intention is to add new and relevant information and updated content. It is also to remove and correct the inaccurate, harmful and adversarial content posted by paid, non-neutral, third parties who have the intent to vandalize and slander a living person, Steve Down.
 * Hi Alex G. SLC, That's a great reason to be on Wikipedia! I salute you on that, however, your edits would appear to be the exact opposite. Many of your edits were both unsourced, but created undue weight on non-notable things (violation of WP:UNDUE), and were clearly just content that is being used to promote and advertise Steve Down (violation of WP:NOTADVERTISING).  This page has a long history of Steve Down employees changing the page to purely advertisements and promotions.  Wikipedia must contain neutral points of view from third party sources. It would appear that the only paid, non-neutral content being added to this page is by Steve Down employees and by you in recent edits.  Continuing to do so could lead to an indefinite ban from Wikipedia. Several other accounts doing the same thing to the Steve Down article have already been banned in the past. -Anon1-3483579 (talk) 23:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC)