User talk:Alexander88cherkasov

Can someone check my sandbox article before publishing? Tnx in advance


 * You can submit the draft for a review by adding {{subst:submit}} to the very top (including the curly brackets). At the moment far too much of it seems to be based on primary sources such as their own website and those of their partners, and less than positive but reliably sourced facts, such as the complaints about their sub-par tech support, somehow didn't find their way into the draft. Also, I doubt they deliver "solutions", and would suggest rewording "backup, disaster recovery and virtualization management software solutions" to simly "backup, disaster recovery and virtualization management software" and so on. Huon (talk) 18:47, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

DRaaS
If your contribution contains new material not at Recovery as a service, please integrate it there instead of making a new content fork. Dicklyon (talk) 13:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Just replacing all the content with your own is not a good way to integrate; it's impossible to review such changes. I'm sure you're familiar with doing moderate-sized changelists. Dicklyon (talk) 14:50, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Also, since you're including material related to your employer, it would be best to declare your relationship and be very careful about WP:COI. Dicklyon (talk) 14:54, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I've prepared an actualized version of the Recovery as a service page. I cannot publish it separately (similar article does exist) and update older version (too many changes). How do I handle this issue? Alexander Cherkasov (talk) 15:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)


 * I don't know what "actualized" means, but you should proceed via moderate edits, not just replace the article with your version. You can post on the article's talk page, Talk:Recovery as a service, to ask other editors of that article for their opinions and help, too.  Dicklyon (talk) 14:41, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Veeam Logo 2017.png


The file File:Veeam Logo 2017.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Euivalent media exists on Commons, this is a simple text logo. Not a an F8 because the Commons file is 'free' license and this is tagged NFUR not needed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:26, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

 You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Deb (talk) 13:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Veeam-9-5-launch-screen.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Veeam-9-5-launch-screen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 21 June 2017 (UTC)