User talk:Alexander Alejandro

Hi Alexander, and welcome to the English Wikipedia. A fine record you have on the Swedish Wikipedia; I look forward to seeing you bring some of that to here. Good luck with Rehnskiöld. (Although I still think that you need to replace Bain and your 19th-century sources.) Gog the Mild (talk) 19:56, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carl Gustav Rehnskiöld
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carl Gustav Rehnskiöld you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:20, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carl Gustav Rehnskiöld
The article Carl Gustav Rehnskiöld you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carl Gustav Rehnskiöld for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 03:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carl Gustav Rehnskiöld
The article Carl Gustav Rehnskiöld you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carl Gustav Rehnskiöld for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:22, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Many thanks Hawkeye7! Alexander Alejandro (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I regret that the article had been unreviewed for so long. Consider taking it to FAC.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  21:54, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Stenbock
Hi Alexander, this is a short note to let you know that I have not forgotten about the article! But I have had a particularly busy week, such that I've not had time for Wikipedia beyond flicking through my watchlist. I'm cautiously optimistic of having a bit more time next weekend. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 06:26, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
 * No need to rush, take all the time you need. This is a lengthy article, after all. Many thanks!--Alexander Alejandro (talk) 11:10, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Magnus Stenbock
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Magnus Stenbock you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:01, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Magnus Stenbock
The article Magnus Stenbock you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Magnus Stenbock for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hawkeye7 -- Hawkeye7 (talk) 04:42, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Seasons greetings
Congratulations on ending the year with a GA, Alexander! All the best for the last few days of 2019, and looking forwards to reading more of your work in 2020 Wham2001 (talk) 22:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated Wham2001, have a wonderful holiday! Thank you very much for your help reading and spell-cheking both Stenbock and Rehnskiöld. I will definetely improve more swedish-related articles next year. Regards. Alexander Alejandro (talk) 20:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited March Across the Belts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of March Across the Belts
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article March Across the Belts you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of March Across the Belts
The article March Across the Belts you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:March Across the Belts for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 22:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

March Across the Belts
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article March Across the Belts has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN. It's a very interesting article.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk)
 * Thanks for the big help, Twofingered Typist!--Alexander Alejandro (talk) 22:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of March Across the Belts
The article March Across the Belts you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:March Across the Belts for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Catlemur -- Catlemur (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Kliszów (November 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Kliszów and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Battle_of_Klisz%C3%B3w Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bkissin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Battle_of_Klisz%C3%B3w reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 15:59, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Kliszów
Hello, Alexander Alejandro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Kliszów, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Kliszów
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Kliszów you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 06:00, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Kliszów
The article Battle of Kliszów you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Kliszów and Talk:Battle of Kliszów/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Kliszów
The article Battle of Kliszów you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Kliszów for comments about the article, and Talk:Battle of Kliszów/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:43, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)