User talk:Alexanderanenko

Welcome!

 * }

Speedy deletion nomination of Fatih Rıfat Ülküman
A tag has been placed on Fatih Rıfat Ülküman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Benvewikilerim (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I have reviewed this request and declined it. The article is cohesive; it is not patent nonsense. However, the article is currently lacking in reliable sources. Please, in the course of improving the article, add some. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 14:43, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fatih Rıfat Ülküman
A tag has been placed on Fatih Rıfat Ülküman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Benvewikilerim (talk) 14:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Sources are required ASAP for Fatih Rıfat Ülküman
The guiding principle of edits is to assume good faith about contributions. However, verifiability is also a cornerstone of the encyclopedia.

Benvewikilerim has called into question whether Fatih Rıfat Ülküman is a valid, verifiable historical person. Accordingly, I must escalate my previous request for reliable sources into a requirement. I am unable to verify the existence of Ülküman via a Google search. Unless you can provide reliable sources that document the existence of Ülküman, the article may be subject to speedy deletion under criterion G3, hoax articles.

Your reply is required immediately. —C.Fred (talk) 14:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)


 * The article has been deleted as a hoax. —C.Fred (talk) 15:03, 17 September 2010 (UTC)