User talk:Alexanderberki

Speedy deletion of Alexander Berki
A tag has been placed on Alexander Berki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk to me)  19:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Kim Dent-Brown  (Talk to me)  19:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked. Accounting4Taste 19:59, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

One more try
Given your username, it is pretty obvious that you have a conflict of interest regarding the subject Alexander Berki. Please read that guidance on conflicts of interest, as well as Autobiography. If you are truly notable by our standards for biographical articles, it will be simple to find lots of independent and reliable sources that have substantial coverage of your biography. However, because you have a conflict of interest, you should not create the article. GRBerry 20:21, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Of the links you provided that would be evidence of notability, MySpace doesn't count, the links to Vogue and WWD didn't link directly to an article about the subject, and the fourth link was broken. Articles in Wikipedia must be about notable subjects and that notability must be verifiable.  And in general, if you had sufficient notability to have an article in Wikipedia, someone would have already created it... the conflict of interest problems noted above will probably not be cured.  If you need help with any of Wikipedia's policies, you can leave a note on my talk page.  Please note, though, that continual re-introduction of deleted pages without substantial improvement is considered vandalism, and you will be barred from contributing or editing. Accounting4Taste 20:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)