User talk:Alexanderfranz

Welcome!

Hello, Alexanderfranz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Saffron terror does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Neil N   talk to me  22:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Personal opinions
Please don't add your personal opinions to articles like you did on Saffron terror. Wikipedia must be neutral, and all opinions/analysis must be attributed and cited to reliable sources. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:07, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Kahaani. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. --Plea$ant 1623  ✉  05:16, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Ekabhishek. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! You removed significant word "fake" removed from the lead in (intro section of Ishrat Jahan fake encounter case article), without reason or ref? Ekabhishektalk 10:43, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for not being here to build an encyclopedia. Rather, your edits have been nothing more than diatribes against Muslims and "Islamization". Wikipedia is not a soapbox for you to voice your personal opinions; you'll need to find another website to do that on. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:04, 8 April 2013 (UTC)