User talk:Alexandra Doria

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Alexandra Doria! Thank you for your contributions. I am No1lakersfan and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Edits) 23:05, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Alexandra Doria. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page MicroEJ, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MicroEJ


The article MicroEJ has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NCORP, does not seem to have been mentioned in any independant sources. Sources are public relations posts."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:44, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MicroEJ


A tag has been placed on MicroEJ, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 17:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MicroEJ
Hello Alexandra Doria,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MicroEJ for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

William2001(talk) 19:11, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of MicroEJ for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MicroEJ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/MicroEJ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. William2001(talk) 19:29, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MicroEJ


A tag has been placed on MicroEJ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 21:34, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at MicroEJ, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. ''Recreating this page after it was deleted following a deletion discussion is inappropriate. I have tagged this article for speedy deletion. Please do not create it again, especially as once more you have failed to show how the article meets WP:CORP and you have supplied no sources. If you disagree with the decision to delete the article you must use the Deletion review process. Continuing to recreate a deleted article is likely to lead to you being blocked from editing.'' The Mirror Cracked (talk) 21:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

September 16, 2019
Hi The Mirror Cracked, I have tried to follow the guidance of WP:CORP by providing sources that pointed to IS2T and MicroEJ. MicroEJ is the new name of the company, and IS2T is still much more known. The page sounds to be blocked, so I believe there is no more possibility for wikipedia to have MicroEJ as an entry? What could be the next steps?

Looking forward to reading your advises. Thanks Alexandra