User talk:Alexandre8

SEMI-RETIRED

Mistaken AutoBlock
Your autoblock should be cleared now. Edit the sandbox or something to be sure. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:53, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Maunus is only human)) sometimes mistakes happen lol. Alexandre8 (talk) 00:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Oops again. I guess I am All too human!·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 01:07, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Hibernia
--Steven J. Anderson (talk) 02:05, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Re: Be careful
I've given up trying to formulate a good article from that one, as those editing it seem to have an agenda against the article subject. Seems a game of fitting in as much "right-wing extremism", "xenophobia" and "racism" remarks as possible, rather than writing a NPOV article. Sad really. You and I both said a passing reference (from a source who has a political bias) wouldn't do, but the agenda-squad don't seem interested in quality sourcing, only enforcing their BBC, career politican created narrow view of the subject.

What you've put on the talk page of the article is spot on! If you already have a hatred of something, then how can your work possibly be neutral, let alone used a source on a site which is meant to be neutral?!?!?!?! Having been through the "reknowned" British education system, an "educator" becomes respected by the establishment for simply having pro-establishment, often socialist leanings. If you hold such views, you'll become "respected"! I do love the "racist" remarks though. Guess that's why the nephew of the former Prime Minister of Guyana has recently joined the party. I guess when people fear a movement, they lie about it and try to paint it in bad light. Regards. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 10:56, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't envy your task in trying to get that article at least semi-decent! Seems unfortunately agenda led editors will constantly bombard that page with their person misconceptions.  Best of luck anyway! Regards. AssociateAffiliate (talk) 13:14, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * well just stick to the rules and the article will be good as new again. Don't fear a bit of heavy editing, it occurs. Alexandre8 (talk) 17:43, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thank you very much! My first barnstar :)! See with Ukip, a little perseverance goes a long way. Alexandre8 (talk) 23:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Re:Sock
Actually, I don't know who it is. I always log in if I want to edit articles. If you presume that someone uses sockpuppets, why don't you initiate a sockpuppet inquiry? As Xijky is banned, it is not completely unlikely that this user continues editing anonymously. Regards --RJFF (talk) 11:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Imanol Harinordoquy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elisa Herrero Uceda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extremaduran. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Bovine spongiform encephalopathy
 * added a link pointing to BC


 * Zakir Naik
 * added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Moscow Street


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Moscow Street, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Frietjes (talk) 22:48, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

RfC at Robert E. Lee
As a recent contributor to Talk:Robert E. Lee, you are receiving this notice for an RfC at of a proposed restatement of a wp:primary source which contains more points than the existing block quote from the letter. The primary source is a 1856 letter of Lee’s to his wife from Texas as found at Alexander Long, Memoirs of Robert E. Lee: his military and personal history (1886), p. 82-83. Opponents have seen wp:original research in the proposal as drawing conclusions not found in the primary source. A rewrite of the first proposal follows an edit break. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 08:53, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

November 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Rappin' for Jesus, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 12:04, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not..
Please read wp:not and wp:talk.Slatersteven (talk) 11:09, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thank you very much!! Too Kind! Alexandre8 (talk) 18:54, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Important notices re: edits on pages relating to certain topic areas
--Neutralitytalk 05:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Israeli settler violence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evacuation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

3RR at Tim Pool
I think you went over the 3RR limit at Tim Pool. I would revert then start a RfC or something. Springee (talk) 16:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notification! As far as I'm aware, 3:RR on WP:BLP is up for debate. When it's a question of WP:Libel policy is a guidence. as per here Alexandre8 (talk) 16:38, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Discretion is the better part of valor. Do you want to find out your interpretation was wrong?  A while back an admin gave me some smart advice.  Behave as if every article had a 1RR limit.  It will keep you out of at least some types of trouble.  Springee (talk) 16:42, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I've raised the issue here Alexandre8 (talk) 16:46, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't skip the other part! Springee (talk) 16:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I can't in all good faith leave a potentially defamatory comment on the article. I appreciate your concern though! Alexandre8 (talk) 16:48, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)