User talk:Alexandrostheoeides

April 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Académie Internationale des Sciences Religieuses. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Domdeparis (talk) 18:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Académie Internationale des Sciences Religieuses, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Domdeparis (talk) 21:58, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Académie Internationale des Sciences Religieuses maintenance tags
Hi I think you may not understand what the maintenance tags are for. All articles have to be sourced this tag is a reminder to anyone looking at the article and to you that they are missing and to look for the sources. If you do not address the problem you must leave it in place. Please do not remove it again without adding a source. Domdeparis (talk) 22:01, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Académie Internationale des Sciences Religieuses, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Domdeparis (talk) 08:12, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Académie Internationale des Sciences Religieuses


A tag has been placed on Académie Internationale des Sciences Religieuses requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from lesacademies.net/en/aisr/presentation/aims-and-activities-of-the-aisr. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Domdeparis (talk) 15:04, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Polo Museale della Scuola Grande di San Marco
Hello, Alexandrostheoeides,

Thanks for creating Polo Museale della Scuola Grande di San Marco! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Polo Museale della Scuola Grande di San Marco moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Polo Museale della Scuola Grande di San Marco, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Are you a paid editor with a conflict of interest?
Hello Alexandrostheoeides. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alexandrostheoeides. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:20, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

No, I am not. Alexandrostheoeides (talk) 12:21, 25 February 2019 (CET)

Polo Museale della Scuola Grande di San Marco moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Polo Museale della Scuola Grande di San Marco, does not have any references and cannot remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can work on it. When you feel the article is properly referenced and ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:25, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Polo Museale della Scuola Grande di San Marco2


Hello, Alexandrostheoeides. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Polo Museale della Scuola Grande di San Marco2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:05, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexandros Kapelis
Hello Alexandrostheoeides,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Alexandros Kapelis for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 20:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Villa Arrigona


The article Villa Arrigona has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Notability, stub, no sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — u9000 (talk) 08:22, 15 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I have updated the page as you suggested.
 * Could you remove the proposal for deletion?
 * Thanks
 * Frederick Alexandrostheoeides (talk) 11:20, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi Alexandrostheoeides,
 * The proposal was already deleted by 93.71.139.208. Thank you for replying here as well; for some reason that page didn't make it onto my watchlist.
 * I agree now that Villa Arrigona probably does meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, so I don't think there's any reason to pursue other methods of deletion.
 * Cheers, u9000 (they/them • talk) 18:50, 18 July 2024 (UTC)