User talk:Alexandru.demian

Welcome!
 Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
 * The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Eurocopter (talk) 21:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Bine ai venit!
Hello and welcome to wikipedia! I have noticed your interested in Romanian Military history - related areas. As a coordinator of the Military history WikiProject and creator of the Romanian Military history task force I hereby invite you to join both our task force. Thanks and best regards, --Eurocopter (talk) 21:16, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies  talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies  talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:36, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)
The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:39, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Sandbox:Alexandru.demian/Battle of Wagram
I have moved your page to User:Alexandru.demian/Battle of Wagram. --- ) (talk) 23:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
thanks for your help with Johann von Klenau, which was promoted yesterday. Auntieruth55 (talk) 19:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Boney was a warrior, away-ay-ya.
I have replied at Talk:Battle of Waterloo -- PBS (talk) 06:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:48, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

DYK?
Hello, Alexandru.demian. I've nominated a few articles written by you to appear in the Did you know...? section on MainPage. You can see the nomination and the reviewers' comment here. Please consider putting in more footnotes and references to the articles, and/or join the discussion there. Thank you for your wikicontributions. Happy editing. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 22:42, 5 February 2010 (UTC)


 * You're welcome, Alexandru.demian. Glad that I could help. Thank you for starting the biographies of these famous people in history.
 * DYK is meant to showcase new contents of Wikipedia. Articles must be nominated within 5 days of the article's creation or 5-fold expansion in prose. I'm afraid Nansouty's wikibio is too old for DYK (unless you can expand it 5 times in length very quickly).  Please be encouraged to self-nominate your next wikicontributions.  Happy editing. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 09:32, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * And thank you for fixing my mistranslation in Gudin's bio so quickly. --PFHLai (talk) 09:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Battle of Toulouse (1814)
Thanks for scolding ChristiaandeWet: "please do not alter referenced text". Unfortunately, it was the previous contributor (93.149.236.75) who first altered the cited text. Since there was a huge argument going on over whether this was a French victory or not, I added "Anglo-Allied victory" and cited two authors who concurred with this assessment. I also added "Indecisive by some accounts". I was hoping someone would find and cite a source that claimed it was a French victory, but alas, it didn't work that way. Thanks for the three DYK articles; articles about Napoleon's generals are needed. My area is Napoleonic era Austrian generals, though I drop a Frenchman in now and again (e.g. Claude Dallemagne, Antoine-Guillaume Rampon). Djmaschek (talk) 02:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


 * I saw your addition to Battle of Toulouse (1814) and I totally approve. I also got your note. Good luck with Wagram. The article needs some work. BTW: I have a great source for the OOB. These Wagram-related articles were created by me: Heinrich XV, Prince of Reuss-Plauen, Friedrich Franz Xaver Prince of Hohenzollern-Hechingen, Jean-Baptiste Cervoni (killed at Eckmuhl), Franz Jellacic, Franz Joseph, Marquis de Lusignan (wounded at Eckmuhl), Paul Grenier, Josef Philipp Vukassovich, Johann von Klenau, and Johann Kollowrat. Klenau has been substantially expanded by Auntieruth55, who also writes Austrian general articles. My latest creation is Johann Sigismund Riesch who sat out the 1809 war. I did not create Johann I Joseph, Prince of Liechtenstein but did expand it somewhat. The Battle of Raab is mostly my work. Djmaschek (talk) 03:54, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:50, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:20, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:12, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:58, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
The June 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:36, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Sacile and Caldiero
Thanks for assessing the Battle of Sacile. (I just added some more stuff.) Roger Davies made the same observation about the French general ranks. I experimented with various ways to do this and settled on MG and BG, but with two people expressing doubt about my solution, maybe I need to think about using General of Division, etc. While we are on the subject of Italy, I added a picture to your Battle of Caldiero (1805) article. I also added a Commentary section listing the authors who believed it was a French victory/Austrian victory/Draw. (Tactically, there is room for debate. Of course, the case for a French strategic victory is overwhelming.) I hope this is an acceptable and neutral way to avoid personal disagreements and Battle of Toulouse (1814)-type arguments. Djmaschek (talk) 22:19, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 21:16, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:50, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Maria Baciu
Hey Alexandru, I looked through the pages and contributions of a few dozen members of Category:Romanian Wikipedians, and it seems you're the only one who's active at all--so let me ask you a question. When you have a moment, can you have a look at Maria Baciu and see about improving it a bit? The article needs more text, of course, as well as sources--I did the best I could with the help of Google Translate, but that's time consuming and I found only a few online sources (newspaper articles). I can't even verify her date of birth. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:44, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Claude Carra Saint-Cyr
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Claude Carra Saint-Cyr, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.virtualarc.com/officers/carraStCyr.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Sahuc
That is a great picture of Louis Michel Antoine Sahuc. Thanks for discovering and uploading it. Since your earlier comment, I use General of Division and General of Brigade for French general ranks, and avoid abbreviations. One of the James Arnold books has some material critical of Sahuc (annoying habit of giving speeches before battle, etc.), but it's at the library right now. When I can check out the book, I will add it. I saw your edits for Siege of Hameln and Siege of Magdeburg (1806). I hope you don't mind if I expand those in the near future. Djmaschek (talk) 21:58, 16 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Nice article on Songis des Courbons. As for Wagram, good luck. I generally avoid the big battles and prefer the lesser-known actions. I wrote the Nordmann and d'Aspré articles, also the Vincent and Rosenberg ones, but the last two are only stubs. Djmaschek (talk) 02:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Claude-Étienne Guyot
HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:02, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK credits for Paul-Jean-Baptiste Poret de Morvan
Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Nicolas-Marie Songis des Courbons
— HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   18:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Mortier
You uploaded a much better portrait of Edouard Mortier. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 04:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Sir Charls Munro, 9th Baronet
Hi, my source says only that he entered the army as an Ensign (rank) but rose through the ranks. In my opinion as a Baronet and military officer he is noble enough to go in the battle box. Thanks. QuintusPetillius (talk) 19:13, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Nansouty
Bravo! Splendid Nansouty article and huge (+90,000 bytes). I'll look at it when I get a chance. Have you considered submitting it for class B review? It looks like a class A but first things first. I'm doing a major expansion of the Battle of Lubeck. Thanks for cleaning up the Battle of Orthez article. I saw it but was busy with something else. Beresford or Hill in the infobox, maybe. Anyone else would not be appropriate. I made mistakes like that when I started writing articles. Djmaschek (talk) 02:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I cleaned up the Intro, Early Life and Revolutionary Wars sections. Review the second sentence under Early Life. Typical of minor nobility? Typical of military families? It's not clear. Otherwise, the article is very well written. A tip: All titles of people and units are capitalized; if not, the same word is in lower case. Example: "General of Brigade Nansouty was promoted to general of division after he led the 9th Cavalry Regiment in chasing off the Latour Dragoons and an enemy hussar regiment." (I made that up.) Other comments: I believe Luckner was made a marshal in 1791, so I changed it. I also changed Poncet's rank and gave his full noble surname. In general, one "9th Cavalry Regiment" is enough for a paragraph. After that, "9th Cavalry" or even "9th" are OK. It's hussar not hussard. You use surnames instead of full names, but please note that there are exceptions to the rule (Moreau, Pichegru). I made no changes to your naming convention. Please do a page compare to see what I've done so far. You can always change stuff back if you disagree. The pictures are really awesome. How do you do that? Djmaschek (talk) 04:05, 1 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Alexandru,
 * Just read the article & did some extremely minor editing - also left a hidden note asking for a change of word. There is really nothing to add. A beautiful article. Are we supposed to leave something somewhere in order to get it to grade "A"?
 * Cordialement,
 * --Frania W. (talk) 03:23, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

greetings
Thank you for the suggestion. I will try to get to it when I'm done with my dissertation. If you would kindly remind me....in a couple of months. Feel free to create a stub, if you'd like. :) auntieruth (talk) 20:21, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * thanks. and feel free to email me if anything comes up.  I don't check this very often.  too distracting.  lol.  auntieruth (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Lübeck
Thanks for adding French casualties to the Battle of Lübeck article. This was a good addition. I looked up the IV Corps artillery chief and I could only find a naval officer named de Peites Moncabrié on French wikipedia. Maybe the poor fellow was only a colonel when he was killed (a brother of the naval officer?), so he does not appear on general officer lists. The next mystery is whether the French captured all 1,800 Swedes. Petre states that Bernadotte caught 600 of them, but no one says if the others got away (I think not). Chandler mentioned that Count Moerner was a prisoner. Djmaschek (talk) 02:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

General Nansouty A-Class review
Thanks for the invitation but I am busy on a few other things at the moment and as my French is far from fluent I could not check the large number facts based on French sources, so I am going to decline your kind offer. -- PBS (talk) 02:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm in the middle of the CCNP route course right now I will look at it in a week if that is ok?Tirronan (talk) 22:02, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't think I'm supposed to be reviewing anything for class GA. I tried once to get an article approved for GA but it went nowhere, though I tried to follow the process. I'm completely in the dark about this. Sorry about that. Djmaschek (talk) 04:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

OD: Alexander, I've continued the "review" on the article talk page. Sorry I've been so inconsistent. Let's keep working on it. auntieruth (talk) 23:45, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Borodino
We got our GA, I'll start on yours this week.Tirronan (talk) 18:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Battle of Vauchamps/GA1
You may not have noticed, but I've started a review of your GAN at the above link.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * If I don't get a response or an edit of the article by the 19th, I'll fail the article for lack of communication.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:54, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Nansouty
I'm sorry, we don't have as many reviewers available at our A-class review as we used to, and it takes 3 supports to pass. I'd recommend getting some help with the prose in the second half of the article, then re-submitting it, we should have more reviewers available soon. - Dank (push to talk) 12:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Oh, I just posted above. I'll not give up on this.  Let's keep at it, and resurrect the review again in a few weeks.  auntieruth (talk) 23:46, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Grenadier-à-cheval
Hello Alexandru, thank you for your message. I had read somewhere that the Grenadiers-à-cheval were meant to receive cuirasses and maybe helmets. I found some fragments of information on and. I can't find where I read it in the first place. As I don't find top quality sources, I give up to add this information to the article. I also appreciate a lot your contributions. Sincerely, UltimaRatio (talk) 11:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Andre Boussart
I made a few of the suggested changes and replied to your André Joseph Boussart talk page note. Djmaschek (talk) 05:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:46, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:00, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

ACR Request
Hi there, I notice you're signed up to the WikiProject Military history/Napoleonic era task force in MILHIST, and wondered if you would be interested in conducting an A-class review for Battle record of Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington, based on your recent contributions, i.e. battles; I require one more Support review before it will be applicable to raise it from B to A-class quality. Thanks, Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh    Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh   (talk) 23:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you. The ACR was closed earlier today due to "timing out" and not having met consensus, much to my annoyance, I'm sorting reopening the ACR. I'll let you know once a fresh ACR can be performed and hopefully if can meet the 3 supporter requirement this time round, in time. Any concerns you have will be looked into and addressed as soon as I have a fresh ACR page for you to detail them on. Thanks again, Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh '''  (talk) 22:53, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * I've reopened the ACR, here. I look forward to your review. Thanks, Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh '''  (talk) 00:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi - just wanted to thank you for your ACR review - your comments were very helpful in sorting out a few rough areas and clearing things up. I hope I was able to address your concerns okay. Regards, Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh '''  (talk) 20:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Quote in Durutte article
Hi. I was wondering if you could help me out with a French quote that I put in the Pierre François Joseph Durutte article. Here is the passage from Charles Mullié, "Le bruit ayant couru à cette époque que Metz s'était rendu, Napoléon demanda vivement à l'un de ses aides-de-camp : « Qui commande dans cette ville? — C'est Durutte, lui fut-il répondu. — Je n'ai jamais fait de bien à cet homme-là : Metz est toujours à nous. » En effet, les troupes étrangères n'y pénétrèrent pas." I translated it as follows, "In 1814 he was given command of the fortress of Metz which resisted a blockade until the end of the war. At one point, Napoleon heard a rumor that Metz had fallen. He asked an aide-de-camp who commanded the garrison. When told it was Durutte, he replied, "I have never been let down by this man. Metz is always ours."

I'm not sure about this part: "I have never been let down by this man." Please fix if necessary. Thanks.

I recall that you found pictures for the Jacob François Marulaz and André Joseph Boussart articles. Is there any chance that there are portraits for Pierre-Joseph Habert, Jean-Louis Dubreton, Pierre Belon Lapisse, Anne-François-Charles Trelliard, or Antoine Louis Popon de Maucune? Is there a book that might have illustrations? Habert and Dubreton were national heroes; there should be a picture somewhere. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 16:15, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your help with the translation and the explanation. I fixed the Durutte article according to your information. Djmaschek (talk) 02:59, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:26, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

New section
I understand why the Romanians hate the Russians and I do not have any problem with that. We have someone that we like and we also have someone that we dislike. But I am surprise because you hate Russians THAT MUCH. Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 19:24, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah the connecction is: I am sorry if it hurt you a lot but I think that you really dislike Russians. With respect. Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 20:15, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

I do not 100% agree with you but, thank you very much for the advices. Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 04:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I know that you do not like the source I used. About the speech of Kutuzov (which is taken from the website of "Voice of Russia"), I will not use it as you requested. If my English writing is terrible, please show me the mistakes and the way to correct them, thank you.
 * I completely do not understand about your standards, BUT, the information I add also have source, and I strongly affirm that it is not an idiotic source. This book was published by the Vietnamese Education Pulisher (Nha Xuat Ban Giao Duc) which is under the management of the Ministry of Education. So the book cannot be an idiotic source written by some brainless scholars, the prestige of the Ministry will be ruined if such terrible works are puiblished. And if you suspect that if this book is created for propaganda or not, I will say that the author writes several books about Russian, American, German, French,... celebrities, and these celebrities are praised equally. And the information I add, at the most, may only praise Kutuzov, that information does not dishonor Napoleon. If there is information does say bad thing about Napoleon's talent, please show me, and I will fix it. Thank you.
 * p/s: I wonder the word "brainless" can be considered vandalism or not. And, feel free to contact the sypsops. I strongly believe that I did not do any wrong. Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 08:13, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Just to make sure that I correctly understand your statement: you said that I made some unacceptable changes about the citated materials, and you show me this link as a proof, right ? Well, in this case, I think I should make some explainations about that problem.


 * 1) In here, the paragraph "The French Grande Armée began..." orginially did not have any citation, so I think there was no problem when I changed it.
 * 2) In here, the sentence "Prince Kutozov was nearing the end of his life, he died seven months later on April 28, 1813 and moved about the battlefield on a carriage." do not have any citation, so I think it is OK to delete. The content of that sentence is also somewhat irrelevant. Then I created a new paragraph "After taking over..." with the content taken from my source, and I transfered the part "The new Russian commander remained unable...ad shrunk from 3:1 to 5:4." of the last paragraph to the new paragraph. "The new Russian commander remained unable to..." became "Kutuzov still not managed to..." but I don't think there are any problem with it. Finally, I add "The Borodino field was too... location could be found" (3) between the "A defensive line..." (1) and "Starting on September..." (2). Both (1) and (2) have their own seperated citations, and (3) is a citated information; so again I do not see any problems when I put (3) between (1) and (2). In short, I believe that I did not delete or distort any citated information here, I just added my information and rearrange the content.
 * 3) In here, all I did is revised the information taken from my source ("lvq"). I made some mistakes at in first time I added the "lvq" information, so this time I deleted the wrong information and added the right one.
 * 4) In here, I added the lvq information inside the paragraph, so the new paragraph is a combination of the Mikaberidze and the lvq source. However, I have to admit that the Mikaberidze information was altered too much during this mixing, so I will delete the lvq information and restore the orginial Mikaberidze one in order to avoid dangerous changes which may lead to distortion of the original information.

About my English errors, I will try my best to find the errors and fix them. I will fix the formating of names and dates, too. Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 13:50, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Borodino
The real issue here is that new users get attracted to major articles that are already at GA or FA standards. So instead of being able to contribute they get reactions not understanding the amount of study and library required to actually help. They don't see that we'll study a subject months before making a contribution. I did a fairly major rewrite of the Battle of Waterloo when I understood that the Prussian sections were woefully underwritten. What no one saw was three months of preparation before I did start to contribute. The major issues with Waterloo, and Borodino, is that everyone lies. Clausewitz says a lot about the battle having been there as a staff officer in the Russian army. However using Clausewitz too much is going to offend a lot of Russians, having a German shoved up their nose again. The reason I'd have liked to have used him more is every single major officer on both sides of the conflict were fully capable and willing to lie. But, I don't get to say that either. Anyway for a new editor to try to cut his teeth on an article like that is just very very tough. Over at the War of 1812 we get much of the same thing and the Battle of Waterloo, though that is slowing down. I honestly see this as more of a structural issue with Wikipedia than a problem with the new editors. I too was dismayed and took an eight hour break before putting anything down after I talked with Sokolov the 1st time. I didn't trust myself to type until I cooled down, which isn't how I want to approach this. Let him approach with what he wants to change and we can work with him. It grates my nerves and not my forte but we are not going to get new editors until we teach them.Tirronan (talk) 23:07, 19 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Can I use this and this ? Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 09:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

For the biographies of the Russian generals in the Napoleonic wars, can we use "The Russian Officer Corps of the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars: 1792-1815" by Alexander Mikaberidze ? It author is an expert about Russia in the early nineteenth century ! Ti2008 (talk) 15:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Buggie111 (talk) 13:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

New portal
I've more or less finished the portal, and nominated it for Featured portal review - shouldn't be far off passing with immediate effect, even if I say so myself, lol. I couldn't find 31 really good Battle articles - much to my surprise, apart from some of the major battles which are very well covered, the rest are stub/start class efforts, with 2 or 3 line lead sections, whereas I want a good 200–250 words, to make the selection interesting. 7 will have to do, there's nothing to stop those 7 being changed a bit every couple of months, and in time build up towards that 31 required for a full monthly rotation. Same with biographies too.. mostly the chief generals, Napoleon, Wellington, get decent write-ups, the rest get a few basic "who is" lines and nothing substantial about their lives/career worth using. I may look into one of those "Things you can do" boxes to the foot of the portal, in time - Portal:American Civil War has one, allowing people to see what needs smartening up, expanding or creating. I think, with the lack of coverage the Napoleonic Era task force gets, a portal might add a bit of fresh interest.. or at least we can only hope it does. :)  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh &#91;Chat &bull; RFF] 11:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. I've had it in mind for a while now to write about the Battle of Tarbes, unique in the fact that the 95th Rifles fought as a whole brigade - three battalions - and suffered many casualties. Unfortunately, it's one of those battles that historians do not give much due attention, unless they are actually writing about the 95th, making sources harder to find, and more often than not, British authors - as they tend to enjoy writing more about the "grasshoppers" than French authors might. I know only of a couple of such books. Only thing is, I'm not sure exactly how to approach writing a battle article. If and when I come round to getting those books, and doing Tarbes, I may ask you for a few pointers on how you develop a battle article objectively, if that's okay. Not just yet though.. taking weeks, if not months, before I do that. Cheers,  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh &#91;Chat &bull; RFF] 22:07, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

French sources
Hi Alexandru.

I've published a short article, Le souper de Beaucaire, which I'm sure you're more than familiar with. During the peer review we've been discussing the reprints of his pamphlet, in 1798 and 1821. We know the 1821 second edition was probably printed to commemorate his death, but are curious as to why the 1798 was printed. I suggest it was possibly part of a collection of important documents to highlight important events from the great revolution over the past 10 years. It seems that most biographers.. Chandler, Cronin, Dwyer, etc don't give the document much coverage, Barnett skips it altogether, and they care more about how it gained him favour rather than the work itself.

I wondered if you could take a brief look at the article and possibly provide include a reliably sourced reason, even a good French one, as to why there was need for a 1798 edition? We're also trying to answer the question of how many of the original pamphlet were printed, how many survived, where they were issued, etc. As you live in Paris, do you know of any museums/exhibitions there which have copies of the original 1793 pamphlet, and 1798/1821 books, for example? I've found the Bibliothèque nationale de France only has a 1821 copy.

Many thanks!  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh &#91;Chat &bull; RFF] 00:35, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If I could wager a guess, I'd say the Battle of the Pyramids was a huge propaganda sucess. But that's just me. Buggie111 (talk) 01:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Not sure I see any relation between a revolutionary political document and a battle against some Marmelukes in Egypt that would warrant a reprint.  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh &#91;Chat &bull; RFF] 01:24, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi Marcus, Hi Buggie, sorry for taking so long to answer. I've had a look in my books yesterday and today and unfortunately I could find only brief mentions of the pamphlet. Most books I have are actually on the Empire and less on the Republic. If I were to speculate a bit (and this if of course no source for wikipedia :-) ), I'd say that the young Bonaparte used it as a way to further his career, in a time when rapid promotions were frequent. In 1798 he was already a famous, politically connected and popular general. Some political elites were growing tired of the unstable governments that the Republic had known so far. They were increasingly looking at the possibility of appointing a popular general at the head of the state. Bonaparte was well-placed, but did have a few rivals, such as Moreau or Hoche, so any means of boosting his prestige could do. Literary or ideological eloquence has always been a way of gaining reputation in France. I'll keep looking and maybe I can dig up some more. Best, Alex --Alexandru Demian (talk) 11:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. I suppose literature was one way of not having to go through the media and any form of censorship/scrunity pre-publication, back then. And I suppose books usually reach the more affluent and educated members of society, in those days, from which favour could be gained. The pamphlet itself does leave room for some speculation, because of the lack of openness about its intent, though nothing too controversial. Be interesting if you come across anything worth including. Cheers,  Ma &reg;&copy; usBr iti sh &#91;Chat &bull; RFF] 12:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:48, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 07:48, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Samuel-François Lhéritier
Hello! Your submission of Samuel-François Lhéritier at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 19:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Mikenorton (talk)

DYK for Samuel-François Lhéritier
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 00:01, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Bessières at Wagram
Hello Alexandru. As for your recent edit, it is Bessières, on the ground with white hair, on the painting of Horace Vernet , as you can see here. Bessières is clearly visible on Vernet's painting, so I don't know why you prefer the low quality picture of Gros' painting. Is there a reason I'm missing ? DITWIN GRIM (talk) 16:36, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Marshal of the Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Fleurus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

WikiProject Romania
--Codrin.B (talk) 03:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:38, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 01:57, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:47, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Lagrange
I linked your Joseph Lagrange (soldier) (nice picture) article to the VI Corps (Grande Armée) and Battle of Champaubert pages. Keep up the good work. Last October I visited some American Revolutionary War sites, so I wrote some material about that war for a few months. Since then, I've been irresistably drawn back to Napoleonic War history. Two recent articles are Louis François Félix Musnier and Anne Gilbert de Laval. They both fought under Suchet in Spain. Djmaschek (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 14:18, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 18:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi, I got your note. Thanks for your kind words. I recently acquired several of Charles Oman's volumes on the Peninsular War so I have plenty of source material for writing Napoleonic Wars articles. The wonderful thing is that there are so many interesting personalities and minor battles that have stubs or no article. Djmaschek (talk) 22:36, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:02, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Battle of Wagram (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Mortar, Peace of Pressburg, Cannonball, Galicia and Economic war

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:36, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Josef Philipp Vukassovich
Hi Alexandru. I see you are new to reviewing so might not realise, but when you pass an article you then have to list it. The instructions for doing that are here: If you have any questions let me know. AIR corn (talk) 05:49, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Replace GA nominee on the article's talk page with 05:49, 4 October 2012 (UTC). Use the topic given in the nomination and the page number of the review. The "page=" parameter should be a number only - no letters. Please include "GA" in your edit summary
 * 2) List the article on Wikipedia:Good articles under the appropriate section.[2] Encourage the successful nominator(s) to review an article themselves.

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:21, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Josef Philipp Vukassovich review
Hi! Thanks for reviewing the Josef Philipp Vukassovich article.

Just now I took another look at the Talk:Josef Philipp Vukassovich/GA1 and I was wondering is there anything else left of Gregor or me to do out there or not. I got the impression that all required interventions have been performed, but now I'm wondering if I got the wrong idea. Thanks!--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:16, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:12, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:09, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Historical Assessment
Hello, Alexandru, I have noticed edits of a part of the Historical Assessment part of the French Invasion of Russia article, namely that of a Parronax's. I do not question your intelligence on your judgement that posting without references may be counted as vandalism, so I have added one for a part of his paragraph that I found interesting. The main thing I had in mind, if I may say so, is that his adding of that part strengthens (from my point of view) the image of wartime Russia. But of course, you, having earned WikiChevrons, and the Military History Reviewers' Award, should have the last say in this.

Thank you for your time, --Arusmanov (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:22, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:51, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:41, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:35, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 16:12, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Pacthod and Puthod
Thanks for writing the articles on Jacques-Pierre-Louis Puthod and Michel-Marie Pacthod. I was able to incorporate both generals in my Battle of Uclés (1809) article. Pacthod and Puthod were the brigadiers in Eugène-Casimir Villatte's division. I wonder if Villatte got their names confused. Djmaschek (talk) 03:28, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:49, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill [talk] 18:18, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:47, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:32, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Battlefield of Wagram


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Battlefield of Wagram. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Battle of Wagram. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Battle of Wagram – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Jinkinson  talk to me  14:54, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
 * thanks. I'm not a newbie here. Please have a careful look at the two articles: one is about a battle and the other about a battlefield. I've replied on the article talk page.--Alexandru Demian (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Moved to userspace
Hey, I moved the article to User:Alexandru.demian/Battlefield of Wagram. My biggest concern is that many will see this as a content fork of the battle itself and that the hill isn't independently notable enough outside of the battle to warrant its own entry. I can see where, in its current state, someone might argue at an AfD that this should just be merged into the main article. It seems to be the norm that battlefields that are known only for battles aren't really independently notable. You've clearly worked hard on this, so I don't want this information to be deleted. I think that if you can find more RS that cover the field itself, that should take care of that. I know that finding sources that don't mention the battle will be nearly impossible, but we do need something that focuses on the battlefield itself a little more. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:40, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
 * IE, just find something that shows it's a historical landmark (shouldn't be too hard) and add it, then move it back into the mainspace. I figured that I'd move it into your userspace so it doesn't get re-tagged or deleted in the interim. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   10:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:55, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:36, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou! The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators,

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:31, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:08, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:04, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVIII, January 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIX, February 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXX, March 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXII, May–June 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:04, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXIV, August 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:57, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXV, September 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:00, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVI, October 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVII, November 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:30, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXVIII, December 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

The Bugle: Issue CXXIX, January 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXX, February 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:


 * tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
 * updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
 * creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXI, March 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:19, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXII, April 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIII, May 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIV, June 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXV, July 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVI, August 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:37, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVII, September 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXVIII, October 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:42, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXXIX, November 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXL, December 2017
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

User group for Military Historians
Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLI, January 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:15, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLII, February 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVI, June 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVII, July 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLVIII, August 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIX, September 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CL, October 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 07:00, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLI, November 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:39, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLII, December 2018
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIII, January 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIV, February 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:18, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:03, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVIII, June 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:07, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLIX, July 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLX, August 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:41, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXI, September 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXII, October 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXIII, November 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXIV, December 2019
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:47, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXV, January 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: IssueICLXVI, February 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:04, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXVII, March 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXVIII, April 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXIX, May 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXX, June 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:21, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXI, July 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:45, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXII, August 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue Issue CLXXIII, September 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:52, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIV, October 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, November 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, December 2020
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:48, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, January 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:06, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, February 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXIX, March 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive and create a worklist at WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive
Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive and create a worklist at WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:07, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXX, April 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXI, May 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXII, June 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIII, July 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXIV, August 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXXV, September 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXV, October 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVI, November 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, December 2021
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, January 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIV, February 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVII, March 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLXXVIII, April 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCIII, May 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCIV, June 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:42, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVI, July 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 20:27, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVII, August 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, September 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCVIII, October 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXCIX, November 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CC, December 2022
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 201, January 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 202, February 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 203, March 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:28, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 204, April 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:33, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 205, May 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:04, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 206, June 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 207, July 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:57, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 208, August 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:28, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 209, September 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue 210, October 2023
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 19:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)