User talk:AlexatTWC

Speedy deletion nomination of Frank Brunacci
Hello AlexatTWC,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Frank Brunacci for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blythwood (talk) 07:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello, thanks for your contributions. Reading your comment on deletion, I do sympathise with you and realise you've got a job you've been asked to do, and also respect your honesty in choosing a username with an affiliation. But this isn't really what Wikipedia is for: right now both the article and the draft on your sandbox are in a promotional tone, not the neutral tone of an encyclopedia. In addition, I don't see a demonstration of notability and if you do want to see that page kept you should probably read that page thoroughly in order to contest its deletion. Above all, you should probably be aware that editing an article you or your company is affiliated with is strongly discouraged - and subject to a lot of conditions and requirements for disclosure. (You're going to want to read that page, too, sorry.) Right now the page is likely to get deleted. Remember, we're interested in whether this person is notable - 'my boss told me to write this article' isn't a justification for keeping it we're going to accept. As a general comment on this, speaking purely for myself, if you want to put up information on this person I think you'd be better off putting it on your website, which you control, than Wikipedia, which anyone can edit. Blythwood (talk) 08:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:AlexatTWC/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:AlexatTWC/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Blythwood (talk) 09:29, 21 February 2016 (UTC)