User talk:Alexbouditsky

Fair use rationale for File:CathRiver-1-.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CathRiver-1-.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:UniCastle.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:UniCastle.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. Additionally, if you continue uploading bad images, you may be blocked from uploading. STBotI (talk) 22:10, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Blair
Yor addition is appreciated, however I feel it is not really worthy of insertion in the lede, and the cite is a bit bloggy. I think we should move it for now to the religion section and look for a stronger cite to support it. Have a look for another cite to support the claim. Ill move your insert from the lede and well talk about it if you get a stronger cite,. regards. (Off2riorob (talk) 22:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC))
 * Maybe the religous faith section, or the charitable section..I don.t know..lets leave it till tomorrow, for reevaluation. (Off2riorob (talk) 22:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC))

Hey dude, I kind of like it, it is a new aspect to blair after all the trouble and I like it. A good strong cite, if you can find two cites to support notability that is even better, and keep the comment neutral and encyclopediac in content. Cool. thanks. I had a girlfriend studied chemistry at Durham, a guality place. Best regards to you(Off2riorob ([[User

I like the two university cites, yale and durham, very strong, forget about the washinton post one. love it. This one [] and this one []  [(Off2riorob (talk) 23:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC))talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 23:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC))
 * Any photos? I am into photography, if your still at uni perhaps you can let me know who is coming and get a photo. (Off2riorob (talk) 00:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC))
 * I see you have done it, well done and thanks for contributing, we can talk more tomorrow or the next day. Best regards to you. (Off2riorob (talk) 00:52, 13 July 2009 (UTC))

Content removed
Dear Alexbouditsky:

The Wikimedia Foundation (“Wikimedia”) has taken down content that you posted at Rankings of universities in the United Kingdom because someone alleged that your post infringes on a copyright.

You can see their communication here: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/File:DMCA_News_International.pdf

(This relates to the addition of the table here.)

When someone makes a validly formulated notice of copyright infringement, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) requires Wikimedia to take the content down and to notify you that we have removed the content. This notice, by itself, does not mean that anyone is suing you. The take-down requestor might only be interested in removing the content from our site.


 * What Can You Do?

You are not obligated to take any action, but if you feel that your content does not infringe on any copyrights, you can contest the take-down request by submitting a ‘counter-notice’ to us. Before doing so, you should understand your legal position and you may wish to consult with an attorney. If you submit a counter-notice, the alleged copyright holder can stop us from restoring the content by suing you. Please note that Wikimedia will not be a party to any legal action that arises from you sending a counter-notice, and that Wikimedia is unable to provide you with legal advice.


 * Filing a Counter-Notice

If you choose to submit a counter notice, you must send a letter to asking Wikimedia to restore your content. The letter must comply with DMCA standards and must contain the following:


 * A link to where the content was before we took it down;
 * A statement, under penalty of perjury, that you believe the content was taken down mistakenly;
 * Your name, address, and phone number;
 * If your address is in the United States, a statement that says “I consent to the jurisdiction of the Federal District Court in the district where my address is located, and I will accept service of process from the person who complained about the content I posted”; or if your address is outside the United States, a statement that says “I agree to accept service of process in any jurisdiction where I can be found”; and finally,
 * Your physical or electronic signature.

Pursuant to the DMCA, Wikimedia must inform the alleged copyright holder that you sent us a counter-notice and give the alleged copyright holder a copy of the counter-notice. We will restore the content you posted within ten (10) to fourteen (14) business days, provided that the alleged copyright holder does not give notice of suit to restrain re-posting of the material.


 * Miscellaneous

As a matter of policy and under appropriate circumstances, the WMF will block the accounts of repeat infringers as provided under the DMCA.

If you would like to learn more about Wikimedia’s policies, please refer to the Wikimedia Terms of Use, available at http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_use and the Wikimedia Legal Policies, available at http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Legal/Legal_Policies. More information on DMCA compliance may also be found at:


 * http://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca512/faq
 * https://www.eff.org/issues/dmca
 * http://www.copyright.gov/onlinesp/

See also WP:Office.

Wikimedia appreciates your support of Wikipedia and will be happy to assist you if you have any additional concerns. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding this notice.

Sincerely, Maggie Dennis (WMF) (talk) 19:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC) == Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Infobox Russian university rankings (July 11) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Fiddle  Faddle  19:20, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Template:Infobox&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Alexbouditsky Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timtrent&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Alexbouditsky reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Template:Infobox Russian university rankings concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Template:Infobox Russian university rankings, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Template:Infobox Russian university rankings/doc
Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Template:Infobox Russian university rankings/doc, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Template:Infobox Russian university rankings/doc and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Template:Infobox Russian university rankings/doc during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 21:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Template:Infobox Russian university rankings concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Template:Infobox Russian university rankings, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Template:Infobox Russian university rankings


Hello, Alexbouditsky. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Template:Infobox Russian university rankings".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)