User talk:Alexbrewer/Archive 2

Re: Apology
No need for apology, the radio station section can get a little heated sometimes (my apologizes to you as well) and we throw warnings back and forth. My main concern was having two fields that say the same thing (the "power" and "ERP" fields) and having the "ERP" confusing users that might not be familar with what ERP stands for. Also, I think the "m" for Meters should be spelled out, also so people don't get confused. I mean no harm to the pages, I just don't want someone staring at the page going "huh" :) Again, no apology needed and my apologizes to you.  Take Care... NeutralHomer  T:C 03:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

What vandalism?
How can you talk about vandalism if you don't even know anything about the topic? I was just updating results and statistics. 76.18.18.222 03:49, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you
I will try to have that in mind, I don't have the source yet but I will place it once I have it, thanks Alexbrewer. 76.18.18.222 03:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

My compliments
My compliments for this edit. I respect people who defuse situations and (especially) who apoligize if they misread a situation. Cheers-- Kubigula (talk) 03:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

NPWatcher
Done - I'm satisfied you have a decent grasp of policy. Keep up the good work.-- Kubigula (talk) 04:12, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the assist!
Feel free to steal anything off my page that you feel is worthy of being stolen. I am touched. Keep up the good fight! LonelyBeacon 05:06, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

A7?
Methinks not. Wavorly Meets several points of WP:MUSIC. What's your qualm? Chubbles 23:51, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That happens to my new articles a little too often, and sometimes I get a bit tetchy about it. Chubbles 00:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

May I remove unesesary profainity and sexual things. 76.176.215.76

May I
May I remove unesesary laguage and sexual themes? 76.176.215.76 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.176.215.76 (talk) 00:36, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Pevsner v. Commissioner
Fair enough -- the article doesn't have any context at present; a decent intro would likely fix that. --Mhking (talk) 05:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Kunbi-Maratha
Thanks for offering apologies in advance. The page does not contain anything derogatory and proper references will added once while building the page. Cheers --Krishnak22 6:26, 27 November 2007

Fair use rationale for Image:Boltshirtcloseup.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Boltshirtcloseup.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Breno talk 04:29, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome
Vandal hunters need to stick together. :)  Corvus cornix  talk  17:45, 8 February 2008 (UTC)