User talk:Alexceltare2

Welcome!

Hello, Alexceltare2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as General Mobile, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 22:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of General Mobile


A tag has been placed on General Mobile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 22:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dongxing, Huanjiang County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spring Festival ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Dongxing%2C_Huanjiang_County check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Dongxing%2C_Huanjiang_County?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hitachi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HDD ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Hitachi check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Hitachi?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm ViperSnake151. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Forums and similar user-generated content websites are not considered valid sources.  ViperSnake151   Talk  16:47, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Conditional-access module, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grey area ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Conditional-access_module check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Conditional-access_module?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Flagging of EF Education First page
Hello. I'm getting in touch to talk about your recent flagging of the EF Education First page. I'm happy to go through the COI process. I've disclosed my employer and COI on my own page from day 1 and would be more than happy to discuss that in more detail with anyone who approaches me as part of that process. However, I fail to see how the flagging of the EF Education First page is justified. I understand your annoyance at me for rolling back a change you implemented, and I definitely should have come to chat with you here instead of doing that. I apologize for being maladroit. It wasn't malicious. I've always tried to engage openly and in following with Wikipedia guidelines. When I make a mistake, it's an honest one, and I apologize as I'm doing here. As I see it, the EF Education First page is short and factual, well-sourced, and has been extensively edited by non-EF affiliated editors. I'd like to understand why you see it otherwise. K8bell (talk) 08:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You don't understand how Wikipedia works. If an article is written like an advertisement, by an employee or from paid sources, it needs to be flagged accordingly, no matter how high quality it may be as this is in violation of Wikipedia's policy of neutrality. So please, unless someone from an external source edits EF's article, don't touch the tags as you will make it worse for yourself.Alexceltare2 (talk) 16:44, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The article wasn't written by me. I have no idea who wrote it, or if that person had any association with EF. I keep an eye on the article to prevent vandalism and unvalidated claims (as your initial edit was), but I don't edit the page myself. I believe I'm following the guidelines and I do not think the EF page is written like an advertisement, nor does it deserve to be flagged. If you're not willing to discuss the flagging further, I'll be glad to request mediation by another editor.K8bell (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

April 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to PC game, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 18:39, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Generic Access Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PC DVD-ROM Software Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:PC DVD-ROM Software Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at PlayStation 5, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 23:04, 28 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Alright buddy, you need to calm down when reverting my edits done in good faith. Alexceltare2 (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Very calm! But good faith doesn't mean that unsourced edits will stand. -- ferret (talk) 00:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Same Sex Marriage Template
Too soon. Note, from personal experience, I haven't run into anyone who is a common editor on that template who wouldn't love to see that template have *many* more entries on it, but we are definitely trying to keep it accurate. Also, I don't know if it goes into immediate effect when the king signs it. If not, it should be added with a * after it until it goes into effect. Cheers!Naraht (talk) 14:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)