User talk:Alexeinikolayevichromanov

Welcome!

Hello, Alexeinikolayevichromanov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bigger digger (talk) 17:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

See Articles for deletion/Order of Charlemagne for more information. I can't find any sources that suggest this is a WP:Notable award, I can't find any sources on Google. I would encourage you to carry on editing though, and apologies that your first article has not been more warmly received. Bigger digger (talk) 17:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I see that you've added a source to a general page, I have asked at Talk:Order of Charlemagne if there's a more specific link. We would be better continuing any conversation on that page. Bigger digger (talk) 18:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm Yopie. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 19:37, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Order of Queen Tamar
Please provide reliable sources for your recent additions to this article. Srnec (talk) 00:34, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello! I added the main source, which is the one provided is the royal house webpage. There is also information in the links posted in the article. Thanks foryour message!! Alexeinikolayevichromanov (talk) 08:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Order of the Eagle of Georgia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages French and Georgia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Order of the Crown of Georgia
Hello Alexeinikolayevichromanov,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Order of the Crown of Georgia for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kges1901 (talk) 09:13, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

It's deleted; here's what's next
I have deleted the article.

I noticed that you said you hoped and expected to improve the article. If you like, I can restore it to User:Alexeinikolayevichromanov/Sandbox, where you can improve it. When you think that it is in a state that satisfies Wikipedia policies, you would normally notify User:Mark Arsten (as the person who closed Articles for deletion/Order of the Crown of Georgia) and get his OK to have it become an article again. As Mark Arsten seems to be on an extended vacation from Wikipedia, you can instead appeal at Deletion review.

Please reply (here) if you would like to continue to work on a draft. -- Hoary (talk) 10:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

The page you deleted was more complete than any other one. The sources are reliable: no other information can be better than the one provided by the organisation. Other links to newspapers prove that the Order is recognised. If there is controversy on the legitimacy of the Order, it must be said that they can write it in the page. But to delete the full page is not, in my opinion, the best way to resolve this matter, as the opinion of some people (without sources) should not prevail upon the opionion of other people wich, in this case, have provided sources. The first page was deleted in 2012. Nowadays, three years later, the order has more recognition than then. A new discussion shall be opened. That's how I see it.

-- Alexeinikolayevichromanov (talk) 12:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


 * I have provisionally restored the article to User:Alexeinikolayevichromanov/Sandbox. You say "Other links to newspapers prove that the Order is recognised." When you have added these links and otherwise checked that your draft accords with Wikipedia policies, go to Deletion review and appeal there for its restoration to article status. -- Hoary (talk) 12:36, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Parashuram Patwardhan
Hi Alexeinikolayevichromanov,

Just to let you know I have added in Parashuram Patwardhan KICE to the Order of Indian Empire wiki, am struggling to draft his own page for him, but happy to supply the info if you would to create.

Tianaomi (talk) 18:11, 14 July 2015 (UTC)Tianaomi

Hi Tianaomi and thanks for writting!!

I am quite busy right now, so I cannot create new articles for a while, but thank you anyway!!!! Best regards!! Alexeinikolayevichromanov (talk) 18:29, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Order of the Eagle of Georgia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Order of the Eagle of Georgia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Order of the Eagle of Georgia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   Ravenswing   14:19, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)