User talk:Alexis Berger

September 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Emanuel Xavier, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:21, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Emanuel Xavier, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. RA 0808 talkcontribs 14:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Apologies. I was trying to add in verifiable citations as requested. Alexis Berger (talk) 16:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Emanuel Xavier. Additionally, contentious material shouldn't be added to biographies of living persons without the inclusion of reliable sources. Larry Hockett (Talk) 14:55, 15 September 2020 (UTC)


 * I apologize as I was attempting to add in the requested citations Alexis Berger (talk) 16:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Emanuel Xavier, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 12:52, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Alexis Berger, I suggest you first find a reliable source that confirms that fact before trying to readd it to the article. I'd also like to use this moment to ask if you have a conflict of interests with the subject of that article, as it appears your whole contribution to the project is related to promoting Emanuel Xavier and removing negative info about them. Isabelle 🔔 13:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christ Like (fiction novel) (April 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Alexis Berger/Christ Like (fiction novel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Alexis Berger/Christ Like (fiction novel), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Alexis_Berger/Christ_Like_(fiction_novel) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Alexis_Berger/Christ_Like_(fiction_novel) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Christ Like (fiction novel) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Christ Like (fiction novel). Thanks! asilvering (talk) 18:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christ Like (novel) has been accepted
 Christ Like (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Christ_Like_(novel) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! asilvering (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello Alexis Berger. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alexis Berger. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE💕 19:10, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. PRAXIDICAE💕 18:52, 28 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Apologies. How do I reply? I am not an undisclosed paid editor. I will look into this. Thanks. Alexis Berger (talk) 20:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You need to disclose your obvious connection to the subject. PRAXIDICAE💕  20:12, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
 * He is my uncle-in-law. Alexis Berger (talk) 18:19, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello again. Openly stating again that the subject is my uncle-in-law and I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. Nonetheless, I withhold from further edits to this page. Alexis Berger (talk) 19:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Christ Like by Emanuel Xavier Book Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Christ Like by Emanuel Xavier Book Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Christ Like by Emanuel Xavier-2019 edition.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Christ Like by Emanuel Xavier-2019 edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

WP:COI
You need to disclose your COI and stop editing the Emanuel Xavier article directly as you're doing nothing but making it worse and more promotional. If you continue to ignore these warnings, I will request a block as this is getting disruptive and is a violation of our policy. PRAXIDICAE💕 15:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I am simply adding citations as requested. I have already addressed your request by stating that he is my uncle-in-law. I apologize if this is inappropriate and will withhold from any further updates. Alexis Berger (talk) 16:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You have to disclose it appropriately and further, I'm going to give you one last warning - what you're doing is making the article much, much worse to the point that it's unreadable PR gibberish and no one can parse what should actually be there. If you choose to continue editing, I will be asking for a topic ban as you are hardly able to be a neutral editor and do not understand our sourcing or tone standards. PRAXIDICAE💕  16:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I apologize but please let me know how to go about disclosing this appropriately and further. Again, I was trying to help by adding in reliable citations as requested within the article. Alexis Berger (talk) 16:14, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You could start by reading the above linked policy and making requests on the talk page. PRAXIDICAE💕  16:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll look for the policy and appreciate your assistance. Alexis Berger (talk) 16:21, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Christ Like
Hello, Alexis Berger,

Thank you for creating Christ Like.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Thanks for the article! A couple of issues, the notability of this is in doubt IMO, as the ProQuest one certainly counts to the general (WP:GNG) guideline, which usually needs at least two reliable, independent, significant refs, or WP:NBOOK, which has additional criteria. But the rest are more questionable. Ref 3 is obviously non-independent, as it's from the publisher. Lots of refs are from Lambda Library, but the GNG guideline states, "Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent. Here, these refs from this website are all interviews, which seem less than independent from me, together with the absence of critical commentary. Ref 6 and 9 don't seem to be reliable sources; see WP:RS, so I've also added an unreliable refs tag. Ref 2 is (probably, assuming it's not a capsule review) significant and independent, but I'm unsure if it's reliable. One of the WP:NBOOK criteria is about winning a major award, this was a finalist, but didn't win it. Therefore, as my WP:BEFORE search didn't find many other refs, I won't mark this as reviewed for now, if you could address the tags, that would be great!"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang 01:51, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pier Queen (poetry collection) by Emanuel Xavier.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pier Queen (poetry collection) by Emanuel Xavier.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)