User talk:Alexkrem

Your submission at Articles for creation
Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia& was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!  Mr. R00t   Talk  16:33, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Athleek  123  01:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Gold   Standard  19:15, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Valerius Geist, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!  DGG ( talk ) 16:16, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Status and Advice
I have rechecked the article,which is now at Valerius Geist and, as one of the editors (and administrators) here with the most experience in articles on scientists and academics. I can see there is no question but that the subject is notable, both under the guideline WP:PROF and the guideline WP:AUTHOR.

it just needs some fixing up. I & another editor have done a good deal of  it, and I will give you some advice here how to finish. I apologize for the rather unhelpful responses you have received from people who looked at it previously.

What is still needed is
 * 1) Your positions after the postdoc before you joined the faculty at Calgary
 * 2) Your sequence of appointment at Calgary
 * 3) The publisher and if possible the ISBN number for each of your books (I'll add it if you do not)
 * 4) A reference to a list of your peer reviewed articles. (Wedon't always add all of them--I'd like to check the list first, but if convenient, just add the list.

However, I have removed some uncited or irrelevant material. Please do not add it back. As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest.  DGG ( talk ) 17:58, 5 August 2012 (UTC)