User talk:Alexmarie

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Alexmarie! Thank you for your contributions. I am CAPTAIN RAJU and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Copyright
We cannot use copyrighted images on Wikipedia unless the rights holder (usually the photographer) follows a specific process to license the image under a compatible free license. The image you download from Facebook does not qualify. Please see Image use policy for more information. -- Laser brain  (talk)  00:14, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Scarlet Sails singer Olya Viglione.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Scarlet Sails singer Olya Viglione.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dogsix (talk) 04:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Scarlet Sails Future From The Past.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Blackbear (musician), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  20:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Except, my changes are sourced. Thanks. Alexmarie (talk) 20:20, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Blackbear
Hi, we've clearly got into a bit of a conflict on Blackbear (musician), about whether to use "pop punk band" or "garage band". I'd like to state my point in an attempt to reach consensus with you, and you can feel free to rebuttal any of my points, however though discussion guidelines, the page should stay as it is while the discussion is on-going. In the source you cite (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9Anqhkkygk), when he says Polaroid were a garage band, it seems to me, like that was a self-deprecating joke. Additionally if you read WP:RSPRIMARY, you'll see that on Wikipedia, secondary sources (like the Alt Press source) are preferred to primary source (like YouTube source). Obviously we can correct information based on primary sources made to correct, however a band's genre isn't entirely something an artist can determine themselves, it has to be through a secondary source, because any band that plays death metal could, if they wanted to, self-identify as a ska band. Also, there isn't even a Wikipedia page for a genre just called "garage" like you said, (there's garage rock, garage house and UK garage, but no just "garage") and it seems too ambiguous to fit Wikipedia's encyclopedic style, as it could also mean a band who rehearses in a garage (which, seems like what he meant in the interview you cite). I hope you have a nice day. Issan Sumisu (talk) 07:43, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Issan Sumisu In January 2020, the article used to say Polaroid was a rock band. This edit has remained for over a year without dispute, so if you believe the page should stay as it is while the discussion is ongoing, I think it would make more sense for it to then say "garage band" in the meantime since that is what was there.


 * If you listen to Polaroid, I don't believe they could be classified in any way as way pop-punk. If they were to be called anything besides a garage band, it would be rock, no pop. It honestly wouldn't surprise me in the least if someone at Alt Press didn't listen his band from 10+ years ago prior to writing 1 sentence in the article about the band. I've caught many errors in AP articles in the past that I don't rely on them much.


 * Many articles have called them many genres. The next most notable example being Complex, who called them a punk-rock band. https://www.complex.com/music/2018/04/rapper-and-r-and-b-singer-blackbear-is-reinvention-personified


 * If you type in "garage band," it automatically redirects you to the garage rock page. Coming from someone who listened to Polaroid back in 2007/2008, both definitions would have been correct for what they were (type of music as well as how they rehearsed). What about calling them a "rock garage band"?


 * Alexmarie (talk) 09:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't know if "rock garage band" really makes sense, because it's stating a general then specific genre straight after it. What if it's introduced as "Florida-based rock band Polaroid" and then as a part of the same sentence as "They released one album, Paint The Town; one EP, Inside And Out; and one demo, The Cure Demo", we add something along the lines "and they have been variously described as being a pop punk, punk rock and garage band"? Issan Sumisu (talk) 10:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Issan Sumisu Yes, I think that is a good compromise!Alexmarie (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lilac (Album Artwork).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lilac (Album Artwork).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

June 2023
Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Blackbear (musician). If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 07:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC)


 * @FMSky I am not assuming ownership. You are simply making edits that are not necessary nor constructive. They did not add value or provide any clarity to the article. Alexmarie (talk) 08:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Olya Fomina


The article Olya Fomina has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "subject does not meet standard of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)