User talk:Alexmolini/sandbox

Alex has added to the definition of reverse psychology. The information added is very informative and gives more detail. I especially like how Alex added a study/experiment within the definition. This helps to back all the information within the article. The lead also adds information and does not repeat anything within the article.

Although Alex's contribution makes sense, to further improve on the structure I suggest having a separate paragraph for the study/experiment to make the structure even more clear and flow better. The contribution information is very relevant and easy to understand. It also fits in nicely with the article as a whole.

The information used by Alex is neutral content and reliable. All the sources work and are easy to access. However, the sources need more information added, for example the content deliverer.

Peer reviewed by Louise Bradley

LouiseBradley46 (talk) 19:00, 3 December 2020 (UTC)