User talk:Alexsol89

Welcome!

Hello, Alexsol89, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Entensys, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eeekster (talk) 08:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Entensys


A tag has been placed on Entensys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 08:43, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Kevin (talk) 09:34, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Lisunova for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. gz 33 (talk) 09:46, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought it might help to clarify that message. It is evident that the two accounts Lisunova and Alexsol89 are run either by one person or by two people who are working together. Sometimes two accounts are used by one person for deceptive purposes, such as appearing to be two independent people independently supporting one another in a dispute, or other dishonest purposes. This is known as sockpuppetry, and is unacceptable. In addition, sometimes an editor will recruit another person to create an account and edit on behalf of the first editor, again to create the impression of two independent editors. This is known as meatpuppetry, and is considered as effectively the same as sockpuppetry, and equally unacceptable. Someone, noticing that these two accounts are working together, has raised the question of whether this is a case of sockpuppetry. I have looked into the case, and my conclusion is that, while the accounts are clearly related, I see no evidence that they are being used abusively, in which case there is no need to take any action. However, I very strongly suggest that you should state here what the relationship between the two accounts is. If you do that, so that it is clear you have nothing to hide, then it will help to avoid future suspicions. Also, if the two accounts are indeed both run by one person, then you should use only one of them, and drop the other one, to avoid problems. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC)