User talk:Alextanium

February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. TeaDrinker (talk) 07:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

July 2012
Your recent editing history at Circumcision shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. 11:30, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Improper use of "minor" edit checkbox
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. 13:42, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

"Uncircumcised" vs. "intact"
I read your edit summaries at circumcision regarding "uncircumcised" vs. "intact". Whether we like it or not, "uncircumcised" is almost exclusively the word used by reliable sources to refer to a penis that has not been circumcised, and is considered by Wikipedia to be the neutral point of view term to be used. This has been debated many, many, many times across many different articles across Wikipedia, and the consensus has always been to use "uncircumcised". Please note that Wikipedia is not a forum for advocacy and Wikipedia is not the place to start changes in terminology like this. Wikipedia reflects the choice of words like this reliable sources make. If at some point in the future, reliable sources start using "intact" instead of "uncircumcised", Wikipedia may be updated to reflect that, but until then, Wikipedia uses "uncircumcised". It is for this reason that I (or someone else) will be reverting your edit at Circumcision. Take care... 11:41, 25 July 2012 (UTC)