User talk:Alexuspol

Speedy deletion of RealVMX
A tag has been placed on RealVMX requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KurtRaschke (talk) 00:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Real vmx
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Real vmx, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Blowdart | talk 13:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Real vmx
I have nominated Real vmx, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Real vmx. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Blowdart | talk 16:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Regarding your recent additions to Real vmx
Please do not add rants against other Wikipedia editors as you did here or philosophical rants as here in articles. Such content is not appropriate. If you have an issue with the deletion of the article, please discuss the issue on the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:25, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Real vmx has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Seegoon (talk) 18:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Comments like this are inappropriate for Wikipedia. If you continue to make such comments, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:33, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. This will also be reported to the conflict of interest noticeboard, where the users there may or may not take additional action. MuZemike  ( talk ) 23:37, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Chill out!
Hi. Please don't take it personally that people are considering deleting your articles. The question of whether your articles should be in wikipedia is determined by whether they are suitable for an encyclopedia - nothing more than that. No one is saying that you are a bad person, or that there is anything wrong with your operating system(s). I wrote my own general-purpose operating system for the Amiga once upon a time, and I wrote plenty of demos that took over the operating system and installed their own interrupt handlers etc. Good luck with your project. - Richard Cavell (talk) 23:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC) 

Richard Cavell (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Participating in AfD discussions
Hi! I noticed that you've made quite a few edits in the same AfD discussion. You have every right to participate in the discussion, but you appear to be just a little confused about what the discussion is determining. The notability criteria require that every article be about a subject whose importance is verified by multiple, independent, reliable sources. If it can be, then the article won't be deleted. If such sources don't exist, then it will be deleted. Normally, a participant will simply weigh in on whether such sources appear to exist or not, and that's all. All you need to do to keep the article from being deleted is clearly state why the subject is important, and link to three reliable, independent sources verifying that- it's something you can do in just a few sentences. Once you've done that, everyone can see your contribution, so there's no need to add anything else that would distract from the discussion, or to respond to each other user's opinion. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Admin noticeboard discussion
Just to let you know, a discussion has been opened on one of the admin noticeboards about you and your actions. - TexasAndroid (talk) 14:52, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Blowdart | talk 15:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)