User talk:Alexvonf~enwiki

Welcome
Welcome!

'''Hello,, Welcome  to Wikipedia! '''I hope you like working here and want to continue.

Happy editing! Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 14:44, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Interwiki links syntax
A co do interwiki linkow to chyba nie znasz skladni - wyglada tak: przedrostek jezykowy, np en, de, pl:nazwa artykulu na danej wiki, np Poland, Polska. Efekt jest taki, ze w artykule pojawia sie w tablece odnosnik do innej wiki - nie trzeba dodawac to external linkow. Zerknij na moje zmiany i. Aha, na zakonczenie - najlatwiej sie podpisywac uzywajac drugiego przycisku od prawej z okna edycji, co daje --~. Pozdr! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:58, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * nie, nie znam, mnie takie zabawy nie interesuja, tylko pisanie tekstow.W German Wikipedia te reguly inaczej wygladaja i chyba sa latwiejsze. Pozdr AvF--Alexvonf 09:22, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Niemo&#380;liwe, we wszystkich wiki linki interwiki wygl&#261;daj&#261; tak samo i tak samo si&#281; je wstawia. Halibutt

Alexvonf: dlaczego napisałeś nieprawdę ? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edward_Rydz-%C5%9Amig%C5%82y&diff=next&oldid=11758223. Żona Rydza-Śmigłego została zamordowana. Czemu angielska wersja jest tak różna od polskiej pod tym względem ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.111.159.222 (talk) 09:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Królestwo
Czy móg&#322;by&#347; zajrze&#263; na Talk:Regency Kingdom of Poland (1916-1918)? Jest tam kilka pyta&#324; do Ciebie. Halibutt 07:35, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)

Radziwi&#322;&#322;

 * A co do O&#322;yki - nie pami&#281;tam ju&#380; na jakiej ksi&#261;&#380;ce bazowa&#322;em, ale by&#263; mo&#380;e opisywa&#322;a ona stan pod koniec istnienia Zwi&#261;zku Sowieckiego, a nie stan obecny. Swoj&#261; drog&#261; - nie wiedzia&#322;em &#380;e pa&#322;ac odbudowano. Halibutt 16:57, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)
 * wedlug nowej polskiej encyklopedii i Olyka, i Nieswiez sa odnowione, jak wynika z tam zamieszczonych fotografii. W artykule o Radziwille musialem tez zmienic tytulature, "ksiaze" nie tlumaczy sie na angielski jako Duke, lecz jako Prince. Wszyscy Radziwillowie sa "Prince" - oprocz tytulu potwierdzonego przez unie Lubelska maja nadany przez cesarza Ferdynanda I. tytul Swietego Cesarstwa "Reichsfürst". Ci, co byli ordynatami na Nieswiezu i Olyce (dwie linie pochodzace od Antoniego H. Radziwilla) byli oprocz tego w Almanachu Gotajskim tytulowani (fr.) Duc, niem. Herzog, ang. Duke. Niestety znajomosc angielskiego wielu najwyrazniej polskich autorow eng wiki - stylistyki, gramatyki i ortografii- pozostawia w wielu przypadkach wiele do zyczenia.

--Alexvonf 09:43, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * To zale&#380;y. W angielskiej historiografii przyj&#281;&#322;o si&#281; t&#322;umaczenie niemieckich ksi&#261;&#380;&#261;t jako "prince", a wschodnich kniaziów jako "duke" (patrz cho&#263;by Grand Duchy of Lithuania (a nie Grand Princedom of Lithuania. Sprawa komplikuje si&#281; jeszcze bardziej przez to, &#380;e ani ksi&#261;&#380;&#261;t ani kniaziów w Polsce nie mieli&#347;my ("szlachcic na zagrodzie równy wojewodzie", i inne takie...). Dlatego z Radziwi&#322;&#322;ami jest problem: czy za tytu&#322; "podstawowy" uzna&#263; kniaziowski, czy ten potwierdzony (potwierdzony, a nie nadany!) przez Cesarza. Ja obstawia&#322;bym przy duke, ale w zasadzie wszystko jedno.


 * A tak na marginesie: odpowiadaj prosz&#281; na mojej stronie dyskusji, a nie na swojej. W ten sposób b&#281;d&#281; wiedzia&#322;, &#380;e si&#281; do mnie odezwa&#322;e&#347; (powiadomienie). Inaczej musia&#322;bym co jaki&#347; czas zagl&#261;da&#263; na strony dyskusji wszystkich wikipedystów, z którymi si&#281; kontaktuj&#281;. A jest ich troch&#281;...

--Halibutt 11:15, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)


 * No, tak gwoli &#347;cis&#322;o&#347;ci, to mieli&#347;my wi&#281;cej takich okre&#347;le&#324; - wszystkie importowane. Diuk, kronprinz, knia&#378;, ksi&#261;&#380;&#281;, delfin... Mo&#380;emy oczywi&#347;cie przyj&#261;&#263; wersj&#281;, &#380;e tytu&#322;y u&#380;ywane przez polsk&#261; magnateri&#281; najpierw t&#322;umaczymy na niemiecki (wedle niemieckich ksi&#261;g), a stamt&#261;d dopiero na angielski, ale chcia&#322;em tylko zaznaczy&#263;, &#380;e nie jest to jedyna mo&#380;liwa wersja. :) Halibutt 11:42, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)


 * Almanach Gotajski rodow ksiazecych prowadzony byl po francusku, nie po niemiecku.--Alexvonf 12:01, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Rydz-&#346;mig&#322;y
Co do Rydza - kiedy&#347; trafi&#322;em na jego grób - zupe&#322;nie przypadkiem. Naj&#322;atwiej do&#324; trafi&#263; Alej&#261; Zas&#322;u&#380;onych. Na samym ko&#324;cu skr&#281;casz w lewo (w stron&#281; Kaczmarskiego) i tam, po jakich&#347; 30 metrach, ciut odsuni&#281;ta od alejki prostopad&#322;ej do ko&#324;cówki Aleji Zas&#322;u&#380;onych jest kwatera Rydza i kilku innych wrze&#347;niowców i polityków. Wszyscy le&#380;&#261; w prostych grobach, wi&#281;c mo&#380;e by&#263; trudno ich wypatrzy&#263;, ale wystarczy kogo&#347; spyta&#263;. Halibutt 16:03, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)


 * &#379;aden problem. Je&#347;li b&#281;dziesz mia&#322; jakie&#347; problemy, to tu&#380; przy g&#322;ównej bramie (od strony Pow&#261;zkowskiej) jest budka administracji cmentarza, gdzie&#347; tak do szesnastej kto&#347; tam powinien siedzie&#263;. Tam mo&#380;na zasi&#281;gn&#261;&#263; j&#281;zyka i sprawdzi&#263; dok&#322;adny "adres" w ksi&#281;gach cmentarnych. Halibutt 09:20, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)


 * Hmmm... w takim razie przepraszam. Po prostu tak t&#281; drog&#281; zapami&#281;ta&#322;em. Ale przynajmniej mia&#322;e&#347; mi&#322;y spacer Alej&#261; Zas&#322;u&#380;onych :) Aha, jak by&#322;em tam ostatnim razem (latem zesz&#322;ego roku), to zadnej flagi tam nie by&#322;o, a jedynie kilka zniczy. Na grobie Becka - ani jednego :( Ciesz&#281; si&#281; jednak, &#380;e to si&#281; zmieni&#322;o. Halibutt 10:06, May 4, 2005 (UTC)

Your message
Answered at my talk page. Thanks! --Yurik 09:33, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Order of Saint Stanislaus.
Hello Alex,

Do you use this page? I would like to talk about the Order of Saint Stanislaus.

Robert Prummel 23:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:StAndrew.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:StAndrew.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &#124;EPO&#124; 15:25, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Sibyllenort Schloss.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sibyllenort Schloss.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Buonaparte2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Buonaparte2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:09, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Napvict..jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Napvict..jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  howcheng  {chat} 18:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Hans Beseler.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hans Beseler.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Kelly hi! 17:24, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Louise von Sachsen.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Louise von Sachsen.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:57, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Raczynski.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Raczynski.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Alexvonf. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Alexvonf~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 21:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 10:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)