User talk:Alexwillis

help me
A client has hired me to make minor changes to the FEARnet page. Most have to do with the capitalization of the FEARnet name. I have made the text changes, but I cannot figure out: a) How (or whether it's even possible) to change the capitalization of the page title, and b) How to replace the current logo with one that does not contain the URL. The uploading rules and procedures seem very complex. I'd appreciate any help you can give me. Thanks! Alexwillis (talk) 17:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * My first remarks here are not a solution to your problem, but need to be made. I would advise reading WP:COI - about editing subjects you have a close connection with. You seem to have managed to keep within the bounds of WP:NPOV (neutral point of view) so far, but it's worth reading, as is WP:SPAM. Now for your question: The capitalisation of the title should stay as is per WP:MOSTM, but a redirect from FEARnet can easily be created (in case anyone searches with that capitalisation). Just start a new page with the FEARnet spelling, and put #REDIRECT Fearnet (just like that, and nothing else at all) on it, then save. As to the logo, I'll leave that to another but will point out that even if you are hired by FEARnet (who else would pay to have changes made?), the rules of copyright apply. Please see WP:COPYVIO about copyright matters. Peridon (talk) 18:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * It seems you may have a Conflict of Interest. Please be sure to read the following subsections of WP:COI :
 * Financial payment
 * Article production on behalf of clients
 * Although renaming an article requires moving it, a redirect from FEARnet already exists so that shouldn't be a problem. You can upload files either to Wikimedia Commons (recommended if it's a free file) or directly to Wikipedia (see Help:Files). benzband  ( talk ) 18:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for those suggestions. While I did look at those articles, I have now taken a closer look. As far as I can tell, all the changes that the client requested are neutral and factual in nature, but in order to avoid any perceived COI issues, should I just make suggestions as to the changes on the Talk page of the fearnet page? I'm guessing that the answer to this is yes, because since I posted this request, another editor has rolled back some of the changes I made to the page. Also, I understand the copyright issues of the logo, and the client (who is the social media agent for fearnet) has assured me that they will get me any documentation needed on the licensing for the logo. However, I'm still having difficulty navigating the intricacies of getting the image uploaded. It can't go to Commons because it's copyrighted--but to upload it to Wikipedia directly, can they pull it from the fearnet.com page, or does it need to be on a URL on its own....any specifics would be very helpful. Alexwillis (talk) 19:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * For your edits to the article see my reply at New contributors' help page/questions. For the logo, it has to be uploaded to Wikipedia in order to use it here, I can pull it from the client's website and upload it here if you give me a URL for an isolated logo there. —teb728 t c 19:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * You may be interested in WikiProject Cooperation, that is intended to help users who have a conflict of interest (such as being paid to edit Wikipedia). Cheers, benzband  ( talk ) 17:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Welcome

 * }

Talkback 2
Silver seren C 03:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I've made some changes to your proposed wording. Can you look it over again and make sure the changes are okay? Silver  seren C 04:12, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

PAIDHELP Talkback
Silver seren C 01:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Finally, sorry
Silver seren C 01:20, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

SGN logo
Silver seren C 06:15, 10 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I replied again. Silver  seren C 03:16, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Social Gaming Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Book of Life. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:45, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woven Digital (March 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Woven Digital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Alexwillis Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tokyogirl79&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Alexwillis reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   07:37, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: UPROXX has been accepted
 UPROXX, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Onel5969 (talk) 15:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Alexwillis help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Woven Digital has been accepted
 Woven Digital, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Worldbruce (talk) 19:28, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Alexwillis help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

When Minor Edits Aren't; and Write an Edit Summary
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Woven Digital, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 05:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Alexwillis. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article UPROXX, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. ''and Woven Digital. Undisclosed paid editing is against the Terms of Use. For more details see WP:COI.'' Widefox ; talk 13:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of UPROXX


The article UPROXX has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * fails WP:CORPDEPTH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox ; talk 14:12, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm Widefox. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to UPROXX because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Widefox ; talk 14:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of UPROXX for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article UPROXX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/UPROXX until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Widefox ; talk 10:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Social Gaming Network Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Social Gaming Network Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)