User talk:Alfad

KIDS' SAFETY TIPS
A tag has been placed on KIDS' SAFETY TIPS, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ViperSnake151 17:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a hangon template to an article. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide a reasoning of why it should remain on the article's talk page. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 17:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I Would like to write an article about Safety ( specialy for Kids and Free TIPS!!!) What is wrong with that? -- Alfad (talk) 17:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not an how-to guide and we do not SHOUT here. Try Wikibooks or WikiHow. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Alfad (talk) 18:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikibooks was launched on July 10, 2003, in response to a request made by Wikipedia contributor Karl Wick for a project to host and build free textbooks such as organic chemistry and physics. NOTHING IS FOR TIPS FOR OUR KIDS, so the question remain I Would like to write an article about Safety ( specialy for Kids and Free TIPS!!!) What is wrong with that?

Note
We have guidelines on what we do articles on and what is allowed on and how we write articles on Wikipedia, see the manual of style.

Also, separate your comments from others by placing them on a separate line. Also, use capital letters correctly. Also, talk page comments usually go at the bottom of the page. You can use the New Section button to start a new thread. ViperSnake151 19:02, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of I Love Velvet


A tag has been placed on I Love Velvet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. TheLongTone (talk) 17:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of I Love Velvet


A tag has been placed on I Love Velvet, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wgolf (talk) 17:57, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Still no response???(74.71.136.74 (talk) 19:08, 4 February 2014 (UTC))

I was away and for my experience, even if I sais something the page will be remove!! Still i do not understand why, when competitor has page in WikipediaAlfad (talk) 15:52, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

February 2014
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as I Love Velvet, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 17:57, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Why this page is inappropriate??? So Boeing is inapprotriate,and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, You right this is a new company and they are Ingenico and VeriFone competito. So why VeriFone can have something in Wiki??? . Please advise asap Alfad (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * It was deleted for being an article on an organization that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant (speedy deletion criterion A7), and for being unambiguous advertising or promotion (speedy deletion criterion G11). Boeing, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, and Verifone have all received significant coverage in reputable third-party publications, and their articles have a neutral point of view rather than attempting to promote the subject. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 16:37, 17 April 2014 (UTC)