User talk:Alfordj2000

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:08, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 CIPURSE: open standard for transit fare collection, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
 * Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

CIPURSE
Hi, I'm willing to help you with this article so that this is getting better, but there are several major problems: I removed your references to Wikipedia and reinstalled the unreferenced - section - tag since you can't cite Wikipedia. Wikipedia as itself is not reliable since everybody is able to edit it. If the corresponding article has some references included citing your claim/fact, then please copy and paste that reference to that section. Another problem is that there are many claims/facts in that article, that don't have any reference. Keep in mind that every fact/claim has to be verifiable by the reader through references! Another problem is: the tag "external links" at the top was not related to wikilinks (internal links linking to another Wikipedia article), it only mentions that there (in this case) was too many links to external webpages which are not directly related to the article. mabdul 09:37, 16 November 2011 (UTC)