User talk:Alfstewartsrapedungeon

January 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Westpac. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:57, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously offensive, and likely to cause disruption (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- The Anome (talk) 11:13, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

[[File |3=The Anome|4=4206756}} Why not unblock my IP and just block the account? Otherwise I have to make a 5 minute phone call and change my IP.

Did Gtwfan52 send you to me, as he was very upset about the fact westpac should not have history from before it existed, even if the concensus was to remove the non existant history as he wanted to keep it there, just because it was there.

I would have regarded unblocking this account as automatic, if it weren't for my concerns about this edit. On the face of it, that looks like vandalism, but perhaps I have misunderstood. Can you explain it? JamesBWatson (talk) 12:48, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

James, with your excuse smashed by the facts listed below, will you unblock me, or just tuck tail and hide like the stand wiki god?


 * That looks to me like a legitimate talkpage question - the Alf Stewart's Rape Dungeon meme was mildly notable, and even had it's own article at one point (deleted at AFD). The connection with this account's username is slightly concerning, but if any other editor had asked that question, it would probably have been given a serious answer. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  19:38, 9 January 2013 (UTC)


 * I reported the user for username well before the edit war thing started. And Idc what meme in australia his name might be, it is patently offensive.  Have we slipped so far as a society that the implications that someone may have a dungeon for the purpose of rape is ok? Can I change my name to Jummy Wales' mama pulls trains on tuesdays? (just an example) Gtwfan52 (talk) 20:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

What is offensive? Rape? Theres a page on that, Dungeon? Theres a page on that, rapedungeon is offensive? but nigger is not? (bet these difficult questions will be avoided)

Yet theres far more offensive topics and sentences on this website, ironic isn't it?

Gtwfan52 is upset because I did edits, that agreeded with the concenus on the talk page! Its stupid to have the history of somthing from when it didnt exist (Westpac). Good to see the pathetic wiki losers sticking together, get a life plz! Thats ok Ill just get a new IP--Alfstewartsrapedungeon (talk) 07:27, 14 January 2013 (UTC)