User talk:Algrif

Also available on http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page and http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User_talk:Algrif

Fair use rationale for Image:Dvb at Crean.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dvb at Crean.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:DVB family.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DVB family.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 16:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Dvb at Crean.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Dvb at Crean.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Eric Bibb image removed
Hi, The problem with the image was that while it may have been provided by his manager for promotional purposes it had not been released under terms that would qualify as a free content license. Wikipedia's mission is to create a free content ensyclopedia so in order to include any non-free material in an article it has to pass a series of fairly strict criteria as explained on Non-free content. In this case the image was used to illustrate the person, and because it would presumably be possible for someone to photograph him and release the image under a free license this and other non-free images of him fail the first criteria of the non-free content policy, namely that a free licensed photo could be found or created to serve the same purpose.

So in order to use this or other non-free licensed images to illustate him you need to convince the copyright holder of the image to actualy release it under a free license (see WP:COPYREQ for more info and tips). If the image is used to illustrate some spesific historic event or something else that no new photos can be created to illustrate then it may be usable along with a non-free use rationale that explain why the image is nessesary and such (though it would still be a good idea to try and get it released under a free license instead).

Hope this was of some help in understanding the situation, copyright issues are anyting but straight forward, and Wikipedia's goal of using as little non-freee licensed material as possible doesn't make it any eaier. It's a hard subject to condence down and explain without getting long winded or technical too. You can try looking over Basic copyright issues wich is an attempt to cover some of the basics if you are still confused, or ask me to clearify spesific points, you can also put spesific questions before a broader "audience" at Media copyright questions. All the best. --Sherool (talk) 19:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Attribution


 * Did you remember to spesify that they must allow the creation of derivative works and commercial use of the photo too when you contacted them? Sorry to further cloud matters, but if they just gave permission to use the image and nothing else it's at best still very unclear wheter or not they actualy agreed to allow the creation of derivative works or commercial use of the image, wich must be allowed in order for it to be considered a free licensed image. Also please forward the mail you recieved to the permissions adress as specified at WP:COPYREQ. That way the permission can be independently verified later if questions arise. --Sherool (talk) 21:59, 7 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Yes. I wrote back with that specific question. I will forward the email reply, as suggested. Thanks for the reminder. -- Algrif 11:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * You can specify the image width like so . If you specity thumbnail (or just thumb) you can leave out the size and it will automaticaly be set to 200px (default) or whatever else up to 300px the user have set in his preferences for thumbnail size (this is the recomended way, hardcoded sizes can get wierd depending on screen resolution). You can also specify a size without the thumb command too, but then you won't get the frame and caption area. A minor "gotcha" is that if you specify frame instead of thumb you won't be eable to change the size, it will always display in full size regardles, wich is generaly bad unless it's a realy small image. That's the basics, see Extended image syntax for more details on how to handle images in articles. --Sherool (talk) 15:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks again. It was the frame command that was giving me the hard time. -- Algrif 17:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

About time someone said "Welcome" - and here are some useful links for you.
Thanks for that. It will be very useful. -- Algrif 16:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Catenative Verbs
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Catenative Verbs, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:English_catenative_verbs. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Reginald Perrin
Please can you explain your problem more clearly? It is not a matter for VPT and I have removed it. GiantSnowman 10:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)