User talk:AliBarnard

Nomination of Jenna Bryant for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jenna Bryant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jenna Bryant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 16:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Various problems

 * 1) I see that you tried to move Articles for deletion/Jenna Bryant to a new title. I don't know why that was, but please avoid doing anything like that again. Obviously if the move had succeeded it might have caused confusion. Also there is a danger that editors may get the impression that you were deliberately trying to disrupt the deletion discussion, which of course I trust you weren't.
 * 2) Please don't create multiple copies of a page under different titles. Doing so serves no useful purpose, and can cause problems, such as making it difficult to keep track of changes to the pages.
 * 3) If you are connected to someone or something you have written about (a few examples are writing about yourself, your business, your band, a member of your family, your client) then you should be aware that Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline discourages you from writing about that subject. The main reason for that is that experience over the years indicates that editors with such a connection to a subject they are writing about are likely to find it very difficult, or even impossible, to stand back from their writing and see how it will look from the detached perspective of an outsider, so that they are likely to write in ways that look promotional to others, even if they sincerely think they are writing in a neutral way. Also, if your editing forms all or part of work for which you are paid, whether as an employee, as a contractor, or in any other capacity, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require you to state who is paying you, and what your connection to them is. (To avoid the possibility of a surprisingly common misunderstanding, editing is part of paid work if it is done as part of normal employment or as part of a work to a contract, whether or not a specific payment earmarked for editing Wikipedia is made.)JBW (talk) 08:50, 30 June 2021 (UTC)