User talk:AliCharlie898

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AliCharlie898! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Writing an article
 * Five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community portal
 * Task Center
 * Help pages
 * The Teahouse (newcomer help)
 * Main help desk

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes ( ~ ) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Empire AS Talk! 05:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu (September 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Uyanış: Büyük Selçuklu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Uyan%C4%B1%C5%9F:_B%C3%BCy%C3%BCk_Sel%C3%A7uklu Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Uyan%C4%B1%C5%9F:_B%C3%BCy%C3%BCk_Sel%C3%A7uklu reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

What are you doing on that Doraemon article?
You seem to be making dozens of edits where you add and then remove the letter D. Is there a reason for this? { $\mathbb{JPG}$ } 10:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop messing about with articles as at Doraemon: Nobita and the Castle of the Undersea Devil Eagleash (talk) 10:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been 'blocked' indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 10:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

You haven’t addressed what was going on with your single letter edits. To me, this reeks of someone trying to game the system to get to 500 edits for extended confirmed status. only (talk) 11:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)


 * UNBLOCK REQUEST AGAIN (TRUTH) = In Doraemon article, I have been doing continuous edits to increase my edits that's it, Truth is that, I was in greed, at that time but now I will fully follow the Wikipedia rules to not do these disruptive edits again. I have understand what is my punishment, sorry for that, please don't waste my previous contributions which I have made to Wikipedia.

Unblock

 * In order to "restart your journey", you need to be unblocked first. In order to do that, we need to know what constructive contributions you wish to make. 331dot (talk) 20:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd also like to know why you were so keen on getting to extended confirmed status. If you achieved that status, what were you planning to edit that you can't do as just a confirmed user?  only (talk) 22:48, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

UnBlock Sock Puppets Issue

 * I won't formally decline your unblock request since I already declined your first request. I'll leave that to another admin. However, your request is... not sure what to call it. It's no good. You, you personally, the individual, are blocked. You are not allowed to create another account on another phone or in any other way. Your different phones aren't different people; a phone is not a person; it's the person that's blocked, because of disruptive editing. I'm sorry to hear you're so addicted to Wikipedia. I'm also rather surprised that you already feel this, after editing for barely one month. It makes me wonder if you had another account before. Did you create the AliCharlie898 account because a previous account was blocked? Please reply to this question below. Bishonen &#124; tålk 14:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC).

No, God PROMISE, I have not create the AliCharlie898 account because a previous account was blocked. NO that's not a reason. You said that My request of unblock is not good but I tell the truth, and I can say the lie to make this request good but I did not do it, I say the TRUTH. I am seriously addicted to Wikipedia, I have so much free time to edit Wikipedia, but since when my account was blocked, I paralyzed, I dieeeeed.. AliCharlie898 (talk) 14:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Please Unblock Me. I request you Administrator please for God's sake. I have received my punishment, please don't add more. AliCharlie898 (talk) 16:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. only (talk) 21:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)