User talk:AliRiotsss

Michelle Maylene ‎
Since you claim to be in contact with Michelle Maylene, perhaps you'd be interested in WP:AUTO. Dismas |(talk) 04:45, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 04:50, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to the Teahouse!
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Michelle Maylene. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 03:56, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Aaron Booth (talk) 05:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Michelle Maylene, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced edits Aaron Booth (talk) 06:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Michelle Maylene shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Aaron Booth (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Michelle Maylene, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Aaron Booth (talk) 01:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse survey!
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at Wikipedia:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you either received an invitation to visit the Teahouse, or edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests page.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host, 15:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Message sent with Global message delivery.