User talk:Ali Imran Awan

December 2021
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Saleem Malik, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There was not edit summary indicating why this should be place in Category:Awan, nor is there an explanation at the category of its purpose. Peaceray (talk) 21:32, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding unnecessary categories to pages. — kashmīrī  TALK  08:53, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. – Novem Linguae (talk) 10:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Categories
I have reverted all your edits that added the category "Awan" to various articles (biographies, geography articles, etc.). It's unclear what purpose this category should serve on Wikipedia. Please elaborate before adding further articles to it. Thanks. — kashmīrī  TALK  23:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Awan


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Category:Awan, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
 * The category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. (See section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — kashmīrī  TALK  08:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

ANI discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — kashmīrī  TALK  09:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further vandalism, as you did at User talk:Kashmiri. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. BethNaught (talk) 10:22, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category talk:Awan


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Category talk:Awan, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Novem Linguae (talk) 10:27, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Important alert
Abhishek0831996 (talk) 19:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Guinness World Records Edition 2020 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Guinness World Records Edition 2020 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Guinness World Records Edition 2020 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nthep (talk) 08:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Guinness World Records Edition 2016


A tag has been placed on Guinness World Records Edition 2016, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.amazon.com/Guinness-World-Records/e/B009HWH01O. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:40, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Guinness World Records Edition 2018


A tag has been placed on Guinness World Records Edition 2018, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.amazon.com/Guinness-World-Records/e/B009HWH01O. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Guinness World Records Edition 2019


A tag has been placed on Guinness World Records Edition 2019, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.amazon.com/Guinness-World-Records/e/B009HWH01O. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Guinness World Records Edition 2022


A tag has been placed on Guinness World Records Edition 2022, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:42, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Guinness World Records Edition 2021


A tag has been placed on Guinness World Records Edition 2021, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Ali Imran Awan! Your additions to Wikipedia have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  13:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Awan (tribe). - Arjayay (talk) 19:22, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

I don't care about because i am not a liar Ali Imran Awan (talk) 06:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Awan (tribe), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Repeatedly changing to "Department of enetics of Hazara University, Pakist.an" is clear vandalism - Arjayay (talk) 09:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)


 * It is not vandalism, it is logical result from my giving references. You should read more about this topic. Ali Imran Awan (talk) 17:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Awan (tribe). - Arjayay (talk) 13:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * It is not vandalism, it is logical result from my giving references. You should read more about this topic. Ali Imran Awan (talk) 17:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Awan (tribe) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CUPIDICAE💕 17:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * On awan tribe i mentioned absolutely correct references, this line has been written by one of your senior writer on that page, i have not mentioned anything else.
 * Genetic studies shows that "Haplogroup T1" is originated from Israel & this haplogroup is found in Awan tribe living in Pakistan,
 * Please tell me Whether it does not suggest that awan tribes is of arab origin? Ali Imran Awan (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

Notice
CUPIDICAE💕 17:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Awan (tribe)) for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing and edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 17:36, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * On awan tribe i mentioned absolutely correct references, this line has been written by one of your senior writer on that page, i have not  mentioned anything else.
 * Genetic studies shows that "Haplogroup T1" is originated from Israel & this haplogroup is found in Awan tribe living in Pakistan,
 * Please tell me Whether it does not suggest that awan tribes is of arab origin? Ali Imran Awan (talk) 18:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * {{unblock|reason=On awan tribe i mentioned absolutely correct references, this line has been written by one of your senior writer on that page, i have not  mentioned anything else.
 * Genetic studies shows that "Haplogroup T1" is originated from Israel & this haplogroup is found in Awan tribe living in Pakistan,
 * Please tell me Whether it does not suggest that awan tribes is of arab origin? Ali Imran Awan (talk) 18:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Awan (tribe). You were blocked from that article, last month, for adding the same claims - please do not start this again - Arjayay (talk) 08:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * This user is now edit warring to impose same edits that got him blocked earlier. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 03:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Ali Imran Awan, stop your disruptive editing. You must use reliable sources.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 05:21, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


 * This is Indian lobby against me, nothing else. Ali Imran Awan (talk) 12:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 05:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)


 * ok thanks, you are not enough courage to publish truth on Wikipedia, I am a test admin at ur.wikinews.org you can see my contributions. You serves only indians and used to propagate against Pakistanis in that way you are building Wikimedia. Ali Imran Awan (talk) 09:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * As far as I can see, your editing had nothing to do with India. The problem is with your unsubstantiated (and frankly baseless) claims about Arabic origins of the Awan tribe that you have been pushing into articles without seeking consensus and despite several warnings and blocks. Since Wikipedia is a collaborative project and you have refused to collaborate, the logical conclusion is that you are not here to build Wikipedia. — kashmīrī  TALK  10:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * There are so many English Histarian writers who suggested that Awans are of Arab origin.as Rose said ("But in the best available account of the tribe, the Awans are indeed said to be of Arabian origin and descendants of Qutb Shah." ) The caste system is deeply rooted in the Hinduism belief in karma and reincarnation. In India Caste not only dictates one's occupation, but dietary habits and interaction with members of other castes as well.See Please https://www.google.com/search?q=India+caste+system+umsl&ei=MrCUYtLwEJmPxc8Pt4OXyA0&ved=0ahUKEwjS0azslIf4AhWZR_EDHbfBBdkQ4dUDCA4&uact=5&oq=India+caste+system+umsl&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAMyBQghEKABOgUIABCABDoFCC4QgAQ6CAghEB4QFhAdSgQIQRgASgQIRhgAUABY_RBgiBVoAHABeACAAbgDiAHsDpIBBTMtNC4xmAEAoAEBwAEB&sclient=gws-wiz
 * ''And you know Awans are in minorities in India.
 * '' Ali Imran Awan (talk) 12:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * You're still failing to understand what you have been blocked for (hint: your behaviour in articles). If you continue pushing your arguments senselessly, your ability to edit this page will also be revoked. — kashmīrī  TALK  13:24, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry if I've hurt someone, I do respect for every Knowledgeable and just person, perhaps speaking truth may consider as bad behaviour now a days. In my opinion I was just. Before I will be blocked, again sorry if I've hurt someone, but if truth hurt someone I don't sorry.. Am I right?
 * thanks for replying Ali Imran Awan (talk) Ali Imran Awan (talk) 16:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 * thanks for replying Ali Imran Awan (talk) Ali Imran Awan (talk) 16:49, 30 May 2022 (UTC)