User talk:Ali del mundo


 * Hi. Just to make sure you know, one of the dorks from the ECT talk page just submitted a complaint about you being a sock puppet. In other words, they accused you and I and another member of all being the same person. If you want to respond to the complaint there's a link on the ECT talk page. Danrz 02:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Your message just popped up. What a surprise! I mean, they've already made every other accusation under the sun. Thanks for the note, but I'm not going to dignify their stupidity with a response. I'm just going to ignore it. You can get bet your a*s I'm going to keep an eye on that page from now on, though. Thousands of patients curious about ECT likely visit that page every year looking for evidence of effectiveness and side effects from ECT. I noticed several weeks ago that this article was incredibly biased and Pro-ECT.  They deserve to hear both sides, and not lies that there are zero studies showing brain damage in animals.  Even Sackeim acknowledges that there's two sides to the story and evidence on both sides. It wouldn't surprise me at all if these two were being paid to lie like this. They don't even believe their own arguments. They just post endless "sophistry" to prevent any changes from occurring. And btw, I really see no point in continuing to waste your time responding to their rubbish.  The more drawn out this thing gets, the more it will just look to outsiders like there's an ernest and genuine debate going on.  But there's not.  It's just pimps for the ECT industry trying to keep the article biased rather than fair. I'd bet money on it.  Ali del mundo 02:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)