User talk:Aliberti~enwiki

I've added the "prod" template to the article Faap Rugby, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Faap Rugby. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

Articles you had created
Hi Aliberti. First of all, welcome to Wikipedia. The articles created by you Fundação Armando Alvares Penteado, Faap Rugby and Contrutora OAS have all been speedy deleted in accordance with our speedy deletion policy. They were all deleted in accordance with criterion A7 (Articles, icon 7: no assertion of importance or significance). Before considering recreating any of them, in case you disagree with the deletion, I recommend strongly that you visit the following pages: Notice that a minimum degree of relevance is required for a topic to be acceptable for inclusion in our encyclopedia. Furthermore, information needs to be verifiable. For instance, you wrote that the Fundação Armando Alvares Penteado is the most prestigious University in São Paulo. This is not verifiable, because it is inaccurate. You may try to counter this assertion by naming a source that would support this claim &mdash; notice, however, that it would have to be a pretty prestigious source, since in this particular case, it would be difficult to assert that the "most prestigious University in São Paulo" is not USP or Unicamp (depending on the field of expertise and whether you were refering to the state or the city). I hope this will be helpful in your future editing. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a message. Regards, Reduxtalk 13:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Verifiability
 * WP:NOT
 * Cite your sources

Proposed deletion of Rogue Clone


The article Rogue Clone has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Book of unasserted notability from an author whose own notability is questionable at best.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

--

Re.: Steven L. Kent is a published author with over 10 books published. What can I do to keep this article and keep adding to it following the rules of Wikipedia?
 * Basically, you have to show that the book has been the subject of literary criticism from independent reliable sources. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:18, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Rogue Clone for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rogue Clone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rogue Clone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:17, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:26, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Aliberti. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Aliberti~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 21:50, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 10:21, 22 April 2015 (UTC)