User talk:Alice0129

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Alice0129! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 21:33, Thursday, January 10, 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Alice0129, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Elysia and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I am Astoria. I am so young and rich. So fresh and Wild. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AstoriaZ (talk • contribs) 05:17, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of AmorePacificCorp


A tag has been placed on AmorePacificCorp, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of https://www.forbes.com/sites/gracechung/2015/08/19/how-south-koreas-amorepacific-became-one-of-the-worlds-most-innovative-companies/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 17:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

comment on page deletion
Hi I saw that a page you made got nominated for deletion. A big issue with the page was that parts of it come off as promotional, making it seem like you aren't writing from a neutral perspective. Phrasing such as "provided global customers with a total package of beauty and health solutions through 30 brands spanning beauty, household, and healthcare products" & "its expertise balanced with tradition and modern science" make it seem like you have a point of view that is in favor of the company you're writing about. Wikipedia articles should only contain content that is neutral and verifiable with reliable sources. I hope you'll keep this advice in mind moving forward--let me know if you have any questions. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:44, 11 February 2019 (UTC)