User talk:AliceStanley11

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, AliceStanley11! Thank you for your contributions. I am TheSoundAndTheFury and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! The Sound and the Fury (talk) 22:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
15:54, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Investment
Hey there! I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 19:40, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Help with article?
Hi,

I noticed you're a member of the Wikipedia Private Equity Task Force. I wonder if you'd be willing to help me out by reviewing Draft: Fifth Wall Ventures for publication. It's a VC-firm focused on real estate with about $200m under management.

Although I am an experienced Wikipedia editor and aways try to abide by the five pillars, in this case I have a conflict of interest (disclosed on the Talk page), so Wikipedia policy requires that all my work be reviewed by an independent editor before it's published. I'd be glad to do any additional work you think the article requires.

Thanks for considering this!

BC1278 (talk) 21:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)BC1278

A page you started (Urban Design Associates) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Urban Design Associates, AliceStanley11!

Wikipedia editor Edaham just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Just reviewed your article Urban Design Associates, Thank you for the contribution. You might want to check the awards section. I think the awards are only relevant in helping to establish context for the reader. Some of them might not be suitable for inclusion if the awards themselves aren't particularly notable or if they don't have lasting or significant impact on the industry with which they are associated. I've also taken out a section on key people and left a message in the summary which reads, 'This section seems unnecessary and only has a primary source. It would be better to write some prose about influential members if they have contributed significantly enough to be mentioned in independent reliable sources.' In summary I'd like to see more prose in this article and less lists of achievements, which make it look like a resume or corporate portfolio. Remember that we are an encyclopedia and our readers want to know about the subject impact the subject has had. We shouldn't write as if we are contractors boasting to clients."

To reply, leave a comment on Edaham's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Edaham (talk) 08:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the comments Edaham I will review and see how best to clean up and make more concise to reflect the volume and quality of awards without listing them all. AliceStanley11 (talk) 16:36, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:CropLife Internationl Logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:CropLife Internationl Logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 00:45, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Reviewing changes to AIG
Hi Alice, I proposed a couple of edits to the AIG article on the talk page here and here, but I've been unable to get any traction. I saw you're a member of WP:FINANCE. Do you have time to take a look? I'd greatly appreciate it.--FacultiesIntact (talk) 18:57, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Article about VC
Hi Alice,

I've noticed you belong to the Wikipedia Private Equity task force and have worked on articles on this subject. I've written a draft article about a prominent VC, User:BC1278/sandbox/Mo_Koyfmanand I wonder if you might have time to review it? I am an experienced Wikipedia editor, and have created many articles, but I have a COI here as a paid consultant to the subject. So, as per WP: COI, all my work must be reviewed and brought live by an independent editor.

I am more than willing to do as much additional work on the draft as you think is required.

Thanks for considering this request!

Ed BC1278 (talk) 21:41, 13 May 2018 (UTC)BC1278

Nomination of Edward Hammond (researcher) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edward Hammond (researcher) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Edward Hammond (researcher) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. (I noted that you expressed some doubts about the importance of this subject, and I agree.) Don&#39;t call me shorely (talk) 14:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Biocontainment of genetically modified organisms
Hello AliceStanley11. I noticed you added an author's wikilink using. I agree that adding author links is useful. The only thing I improved in your edit is that you had not yet learned about the author-link1 parameter. If the ref has a template then you can do it that way as I did. If there is no template then  is the only way however. Invasive Spices (talk) 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Invasive Spices! AliceStanley11 (talk) 18:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022 WikiProject Finance & Investment Newsletter

 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022 WikiProject Finance & Investment Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, AliceStanley11

Thank you for creating Alan McHughen.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:06, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Finance & Investment June 2022 Newsletter

 * Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)