User talk:Aliceaedy1993

Anastasia Taylor-Lind breakage
Hello. Thank you for your contribution of "English/Swedish photojournalist" to Anastasia Taylor-Lind. However, please take care with editing because you both removed a good quality independent reliable source ("guardian-andreasson") which was valuable for the article (which also broke things further on in the article where that ref was referred to); and also added a source that did not support the claims it was pertaining to (www.anastasiataylorlind.com). I have restored The Guardian source and switched the URL you added to www.anastasiataylorlind.com/about. Thank you. -Lopifalko (talk) 13:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi there. I am the assistant of Anastasia Taylor-Lind, making accurate changes. Much of the information on this page is inaccurate. I have just spent two hours making changes that have now been deleted. Could you let me know how to ensure that the amendments are not deleted. Many thanks.
 * What you did has not been "deleted", it can all be found by going through the log, see the "View history" option at the top of each page, so nothing is lost. Biographies of living people must have all facts sourced to preferably an independent reliable source, or failing that to a primary source. None of what you added was sourced; and you also removed 4 of the existing sources. Please make your changes one at a time, so as to make it easier for those of us following along to be able to follow and check what you have done, thanks. -Lopifalko (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Please do not add inline external links, please instead add references. You can read how to do that at Help:Referencing for beginners and Tutorial/Citing sources. Thanks. -Lopifalko (talk) 14:10, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Could you just let me do a few hours of work on this, then you can amend if you think it is incorrect. I have been working on this for a few hours and you continue to undo my work. I have deleted facts that are incorrect, and I am building up the references as I go.
 * OK, go for it; you gave no indication that you weren't just breaking it and not coming back. -Lopifalko (talk) 14:37, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Anastasia, who I am sat with now says, there are facts that are incorrect and need updating. There is a lot missing and we are adding it now. Please be respectful and kind and will be factual and sourced to the best of our ability. If you want to make amendments afterwards, please do, but give us a few hours. There is a huge amount to be added. Could you please guide me on how can I get back the work already done? It is our first time doing this.
 * Use the "View history" link near the top of the page. There you can click on the date of each revision to see what the page looked like at that time. You can then use the edit button at the top of the page. You can then copy and paste the plain text version, or if you prefer the visual editor then you can switch between "Visual editing" and "Source editing" using the pen icon in the top right of the page. Note that only facts for which you have an independent reliable source can be added, which is particularly appropriate as you have a conflict of interest. Given that conflict, please do not use primary sources to support any of the facts. Independent sources not only validate the information in a way Wikipedia can trust, but also indicates the notability of the information. -Lopifalko (talk) 14:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi there, I have made various changes. I tried my very best to make the proper citations, sources and referencing. Nothing is inaccurate. Please let me know what amendments might have to be made, if you would like to make amendments. Please don't delete the work, it has taken me all day. I would really appreciate your help to make corrections, rather than removing the work. Thanks so much!
 * In case you didn't notice, I responded in the talk page of the article itself, as that's the proper place for this. Lopifalko (talk) 15:58, 10 December 2019 (UTC)