User talk:Alidhtounes

April 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tunisia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 22:20, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tunisia. M.Bitton (talk) 22:22, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Tunisia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 22:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Edit warring at Tunisia
You are involved in a big edit war at this article. The revision of the edit war your making are vandalism. Administrator may have the rights to block you indefinitely and protect the page indefinitely for excessive vandalism. Kaseng55 (talk) 23:30, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

"Is" versus "should be"
Wikipedia articles are about facts and circumstances as they are, and they're written in an objective manner. They aren't a forum for covering a topic in the manner that reflects what one editor or another believes should be. Rejection of your edits isn't a commentary on your outlook, it's just that Wikipedia isn't a place to promote one's outlook. See WP:Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Largoplazo (talk) 00:10, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The SandDoctor Talk 04:37, 27 April 2021 (UTC)