User talk:Alienforce2k9

January 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Markiplier has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Markiplier was changed by Alienforce2k9 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956995 on 2015-01-10T03:20:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:20, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Markiplier. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  03:24, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Markiplier with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Haminoon (talk) 03:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, I'm Takeaway. An edit that you recently made to Columbian Exchange seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! - Takeaway (talk) 22:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Columbian Exchange with this edit, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 22:54, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm AKS.9955. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Barack Obama has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  19:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Augie Chapas


A tag has been placed on Augie Chapas, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 20:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump, you may be blocked from editing. - MrX 16:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at CNN, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 19:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fox News, you may be blocked from editing. Alsee (talk) 15:05, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kanye West have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 04:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 January
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * On the Schoology page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=761739669 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F761739669%7CSchoology%5D%5D Ask for help])

January 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at White House ‎, you may be blocked from editing. APK whisper in my ear  04:30, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 12:52, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

It's hard to believe that someone who only screwed around on here for 2 years really wants to change. What would you edit? How could we trust your edits, without constantly checking them? The unblock request rings kind of hollow. However, in the spirit of kindness, I'll propose the following 2nd chance. If you're willing to put in some serious work (note the phrase "significant and well-researched improvements") then we can revisit.

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
 * Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
 * Read our guide to improving articles
 * Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
 * If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
 * Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
 * Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
 * do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this:  );
 * do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this:  Name.jpg );
 * do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:  );
 * do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this:  );
 * Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: ) the copied content but do not save yet ;
 * Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [ [exact Name of Article]] ; see that article's history for attribution."
 * You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose:  . Once you have added the template, click.
 * Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
 * When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
 * If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "" to your talk page. Thank you. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:20, 24 August 2017 (UTC)