User talk:Alightinflesh

sphinx defined:

sphinx as an epitome of the pinnacle of human consciousness addresses and rebuffs certain criterea of knowledge. -Addresses, in the strict sense, of resembling a potential. -Rebuffs, not in a confrontational way, instead a deceptiveness which, by virtue of its gracefulness goes further and further toward an objective undefined. -And, lastly, the level of constructive dialogue on the whole is responsible for transcending some of the minor facts into more elevated trans-personal methodology.

Unusual, if uneducated, tales have arisen relative to the veri-simulitude of individual preconceptions: -The goal of lucifer, on the whole, to be soulful enough to deceive mortals into convincing themselves there is an entirety which exists outside the relative mind. Which is true and verily false. Lucifer, in this sense, being relevant as it pertains to mortals' folly and desires-which, of course, are not relevant in this context unless one commits to the notion which offers Lucifer as a master storyteller with no more power than a whisper. A whisper being less than convincing. While the objective is clarity, the miasma of delusional patterning becomes a much greater giant than before.

As the operative gathering of the fundamentals addressed by the sphinx (none of which are accurate), that an individual relates to as "unknown" thru the most palatable of means. -In this case the "unknown" is, in fact, gathered via the modality of taste-organ as we have all parsed human-creatures, known as cats, in the unremarkable act of licking one's paws. Unlikely, will something as astute (apologies for such cheekiness as "astute," adhering to grammar principles becomes steadily more arduous over time) as the sphinx will belie its fundamental properties, none-of-which are contrarian. This begs the extraordinary fo pah of which the observer can level the less binding properties of division, reduction, spellbinding-beauty and mercilessness. These as properties are not as easily palatable.