User talk:Alikelik99

June 2014
Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Propamidine, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Clinical Psychology Review. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Clinical Psychology Review was changed by Alikelik99 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2014-06-05T19:46:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:46, 5 June 2014 (UTC)