User talk:Alimomo92

Welcome!
Hi Alimomo92! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:02, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Important notice
Users with fewer than 500 edits [...] are prohibited from editing content within the area of conflict. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Copyright infringement, and edit-warring
In the article Roman Abramovich you have repeatedly posted material copied from the BBC's web site. What is more, on one occasion you did so by undoing an edit for which the edit summary stated that the text was removed as a copyright infringement. You must have seen that edit summary, so you certainly knew what you were doing. Don't post material to Wikipedia which you have copied from elsewhere unless you have ascertained that it is either in the public domain or licensed for free reuse in terms compatible with Wikipedia's licensing terms, which is not the case for the vast majority of web sites, and certainly not for the BBC. If you persist in breaking copyright law you will be blocked from editing. JBW (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Even if there were no copyright problem, your multiple attempts to restore your preferred version of material at Roman Abramovich would be problematic, because repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree, known as "edit-warring", is considered disruptive. Users are expected to collaborate with others, and to try to reach agreement, or failing that at least an acceptable compromise, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. A more detailed account is available in Wikipedia's policy on edit-warring, and it may help to read that policy. Note that editors who persist in edit-warring may be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption. JBW (talk) 22:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

OK 👍 Alimomo92 (talk) 08:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
To enforce an arbitration decision and for violating the 500/30 restriction that was previously explained to you, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year&#32;from certain pages (Roman Abramovich). You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:01, 11 March 2022 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

OK 👍 Alimomo92 (talk) 08:25, 11 March 2022 (UTC)