User talk:Alina zakharchuk

March 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 23:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Alina zakharchuk (talk) 00:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello Alina zakharchuk. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alina zakharchuk. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

unblock discussion
Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information.. Please modify your current unblock template accordingly. Thnaks &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:51, 2 March 2024 (UTC)


 * They were not perceived as spam. They were spam. Please get a grip on that. You will not be unblocked to add spam links. Thanks &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:53, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I am just learning SEO, and in yesterday's class, we were shown Wikipedia. I haven't worked with these projects for a long time, as I'm trying to change my profession from a content creator to an SEO specialist. The links to the websites were just at hand. I couldn't even imagine the seriousness of the consequences. In any case, I had no malicious intent. I apologize once again.
 * I can provide a document about the beginning of my studies in the field of SEO at a local digital marketing school. Alina zakharchuk (talk) 01:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * That won't be necessary. Wikipedia is not the place to practice/perform SEO. Please pass that along to other members of your class. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:28, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I understand. Even if you don't unblock me, it's deserved, I understand. But please, do not impose sanctions on the websites. Their owners are not even aware that I left the links; I used these sites for study purposes. Alina zakharchuk (talk) 01:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)