User talk:AlinafeSarto

April 2023
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 03:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)


 * MrOllie
 * According to your excuse, almost 90% links are not trustworthy on Wikipedia. And added links are not mentioning any type of advertising or promotional term where put link, so don't make yourself illiterate  I hope you understand. 103.240.34.98 (talk) 05:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * @MrOllie are you fool or like you pretend? AlinafeSarto (talk) 12:12, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * @MrOllie Can you give reason that you are remove uae? UAE is not country or what AlinafeSarto (talk) 12:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * All Other are fine but when you add uae it will be not fine with you right@MrOllie AlinafeSarto (talk) 12:14, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Just stop spamming us. MrOllie (talk) 12:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. PhilKnight (talk) 12:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:AlinafeSarto


A tag has been placed on User:AlinafeSarto, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. MrOllie (talk) 12:17, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:
A tag has been placed on User:MrOllie, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information. AlinafeSarto (talk) 12:49, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Noting the removal of the fake signature Faking another user's signature is, of course, not acceptable. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2023 (UTC)