User talk:Alioki

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --əˈnongahy ♫Look What I've Done!♫ 21:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

RE: Zack Fair
First off, cool down and stop with the name calling; keep good faith. Attacking me does no good, and those are also Wiki policies. Second, I removed it once. Now, explain to me: why should it stay? Why is this fansite considered reliable? What policy specifically are you referring to? Yes, your fansite is nice (though I have not gone in-depth, there is any innaccuracy about the wolf). I only remove things that hinder the article, rather than improve it, and anyone else watching an article does the same. Now, why do I consider this link unable to be added? Well, because of this: External links, number 11. It clearly states that fansites are not allowed unless written by a recognized author. I cannot find your full name on the site, let alone proof that you are reputable. Being a translator does not mean that your website is considered a reliable source (if that were the case, I could make a fansite about a German series and call it reliable, despite the fact that it wouldn't because I am, quite frankly, a nobody in the world of reviewing or writing). For a person to be considered reliable (according to Verifiability they should be an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications. But, now it's your turn: what proof do you have to counter these policies? WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 21:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Barack Obama and race
We've had repeated discussions about how to describe Obama's race on the talk page. The product of those discussions has been a consensus, in line with site policy, to say "African-American". See the second FAQ. Also, please take note that the article is on an indefinite probation. That's not a warning, just FYI.--chaser (talk) 03:31, 7 July 2009 (UTC)