User talk:Alipka

July 2013
Hello, Alipka. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article The Journal of Physiology, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 13:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

The Journal of Physiology
Hi, I guess you didn't notice, but your edits screwed up the references (only 1 is displayed where there should be 2), added unnecessary detail (no need to specify where Blackwell or Stanford are based, that's in the articles on them), talks about The Journal as if it is the Bible (just "the journal" suffices), and most of all, added a huge list of papers by Nobel Prize winners. As I explained in my edit summary, these people generally write hundreds of papers during their careers, so by itself it is nothing special that a journal has published papers by Nobel Prize winners. Something like that should only be mentioned in an article on a journal if there is a specific reason for it. For example, our article on Nature (journal) does not list the (many more) articles from Nobel Prize winners that they have published. The only time the word "Nobel" is actually mentioned is for a case where they initially rejected work that later was awarded. I strongly suggest that you revert yourself immediately. Remember that an encyclopedic article is not the same as the home page of your journal where you can publish anything you want. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 13:16, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:The Journal of Physiology.gif
Thanks for uploading File:The Journal of Physiology.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 14:45, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:EP 101.1 cover.jpg.png


A tag has been placed on File:EP 101.1 cover.jpg.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Journal of Physiology.gif
Thanks for uploading File:The Journal of Physiology.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)