User talk:AlishaCoelho85

Welcome
Hello, AlishaCoelho85, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  19:07, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Reliable sources from professional critics
Per WikiProject_Films/Style_guidelines, Wikipedia only includes professional reviews from reliable sources. In reading both the [disclaimer] and the about us] from in.com, it does not appear that they place much value on being careful about the editorial quality of the material they allow on their site and so I am going to remove the reviews you have posted. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  19:47, 18 March 2013 (UTC)


 * in addition, it would appear that you may have written several of the reviews, if you are indeed Alisha Coelho. Please see the conflict of interest policy regarding spamming your own work into articles. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  19:59, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Dear RedPenOfDoom, I'm a bit unsure about how to reply so bear with me since I am a Wiki noob. While I was unaware about the Conflict of Interest policy and will refrain from plugging my own work here, in.com is indeed among reliable sources to list reviews from. We are a Network 18 property, have been in existence since July 2008 and have been reviewing films since August, 2011.
 * time in existence does not make a reliable source - what makes a reliable source is one that has a reputation for editorial review and oversight and standing behind the content that it publishes. in.com seems to go out of its way to claim no responsibility for its content, hence we do not consider it a reliable source. --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  04:54, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

RedPenOfDoom, your objections are a tad ignorant. Disclaimer statements by other websites that pass off as 'reliable sources' are similarly worded (see [Rediff's disclaimer] or even that of [Huffington Post]). They too offer NO guarantees for accuracy of information and take NO responsibility for information from third party links. Also, who is we? Kindly identify your biases (puzzling as they are) as your own. You'll be hard pressed to find a 'reliable' (read: not an individual blog) source of information online that doesn't come with similar disclaimers. I suggest you first go looking for such a site, before biting the heads off other newcomers and making ill-informed objections.AlishaCoelho85 (talk) 05:33, 21 March 2013 (UTC)