User talk:Alishereen

Nazreen Ali
I’m sorry but you will need to reflect on the purpose of Wikipedia. It’s an encyclopaedia. That is, at all costs it needs to stay neutral in tone, accurate and well referenced. It also needs to cover only notable things about notable people, events or occurrences and all non-notable material should be removed. I’m afraid that the Nazreen Ali page is unlikely to survive (in its current form, anyway). It has no references at all. It only has a mess of external links. My own view is that this woman simply fails to satisfy Wikipedia notability criteria, a fact that another anonymous editor has also picked up on. The page does not establish that she’s newsworthy beyond a single event, and even for that event it’s hard to make a case that she’s noteworthy. Sorry. I repeat my edit summary: Wikipedia requires reliable third-party sources (as references, not external links) and the article must be thoroughly verifiable, accurate and neutral in tone. It’s not. I've added the key relevant guidelines below. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre 04:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Relevant Wikipedia rules
Wikipedia requires citations to reliable, authoritative, and neutral third-party sources. Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. I removed most things that violated these guidelines. I also removed social network links according to WP:LINKSTOAVOID. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre 05:47, 31 March 2018 (UTC)