User talk:Alison/Archive 40

CSD
Allie, I have in the past tended to notify you, with varying degrees of glee, when I remove the last entry from WP:CSD. Although it has probably grown since I started this message, it was empty when I came here. Just wanted to make contact. -- Anthony.bradbury "talk" 20:59, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi, would you be so kind as to give us support!
Hello, I hope you're doing fine~and that the Irish Wiktionary is growing constantly and surely. I'm part of an association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to that moment. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: Wikimedia CAT. Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care! Capsot (talk) 11:01, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Go raibh maith agat. Tabhair aire! Capsot (talk) 15:00, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

South Bay
Hi there, as you're more familiar with the user and their sockpuppetry, you may want to look over, as this user just sticks out to me. This user's editing patterns, edit summaries and WikiStalk just makes it all the more fishy. Regards. — ξ  xplicit  04:57, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

A note
You may be interested (you've probably heard this) in this page. The user has retired, but a block that you issued is cited. Thanks,  m o n o   05:02, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CTC logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:CTC logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Juice Plus distributor edits?
Would you please cast a quick eye over the recent history at Juice Plus? There have been several dubious edits and it may be necessary to protect the article. Also some details of remuneration systems have been added, which are (presumably) specific to the US market and are therefore too specific on WP. Whatever, action may need to be taken, even if it's just warning the current protagonists! Thanks. --TraceyR (talk) 16:33, 15 June 2010 (UTC)


 * As a non involved editor I have come across an article mentioning Wikipedia and the use of a POV tag as advertising. Have thus removed the tag as without any indication of what the POV concerns are the tag does not belong.  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 17:23, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

SPI Sudafedfiend8
I ran across a new account with obvious Wiki skills and did quick search on their activity. I discovered an SPI where the master was blocked indefinitely and I think I found some more of their socks. The suspected socks are, , , and. I saw that you were the checkuser and wanted to alert you before I take any action. I'll probably monitor the pages for a little longer before I do anything of course unless you want to take care of it yourself. Please leave me a tb if you respond here. Ol Yeller Talktome 19:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Email
Alison, I have sent you an email regarding a checkuser related issue, please check your email and reply ASAP. Thanks. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 02:54, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Pedophilia
Hi, I have undone your recent edit here. Please do not add the important policy tag to pages that have not achieved consensus to become a policy. Check over the discussions on the talkpage-- there is no consensus there either way and the current tag is much more accurate in describing the function of the page. Please seek a well-advertised RfC if you want this to be a policy. Remember, no editor here can declare policy by fiat just because he/she wishes it to be that way. Thanks,  Them From  Space  02:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC)